- #1
soandos
- 166
- 0
x==Sqrt[0+Sqrt[0+Sqrt[x+Sqrt[0+...]]]]
x==Sqrt[x]
x==1 and zero
1==Sqrt[0+Sqrt[0+Sqrt[x+Sqrt[0+...]]]]==0
1==0
x==Sqrt[x]
x==1 and zero
1==Sqrt[0+Sqrt[0+Sqrt[x+Sqrt[0+...]]]]==0
1==0
soandos said:x==Sqrt[0+Sqrt[0+Sqrt[x+Sqrt[0+...]]]]
x==Sqrt[x]
x==1 and zero
1==Sqrt[0+Sqrt[0+Sqrt[x+Sqrt[0+...]]]]==0
1==0
soandos said:I am not multiplying by zero in any step though, i am just saying that Sqrt[0+Sqrt[0+Sqrt[x+Sqrt[0+...]]]]==x
means that Sqrt[0+x]==x
soandos said:thanks.
btw epkid08, that is not what i was saying. i was saying that value of the function was x, not the zeros of f(x)
epkid08 said:It was an analogy. The message was that if x = {a,b}, a≠b.
x=√(x)
x={0,1}
0≠1
Identifying flaws in a proof is important because it helps ensure the accuracy and validity of the argument being presented. This is especially crucial in the field of science where incorrect conclusions can have serious consequences.
Scientists will carefully examine the assumptions, logic, and evidence presented in a proof to determine if there are any errors or inconsistencies. They may also conduct experiments or gather additional data to test the validity of the proof.
Some common types of flaws in proofs include incorrect assumptions, faulty reasoning, insufficient or biased evidence, and mathematical errors. These flaws can lead to incorrect conclusions or unsupported claims.
In science, it is generally accepted that no proof can be considered completely flawless. This is because new evidence or discoveries can always potentially challenge or improve upon existing theories and conclusions. However, a well-supported and thoroughly tested proof can be considered a strong and reliable explanation.
Identifying flaws in a proof can lead to a better understanding of a particular phenomenon or concept, and can also inspire further research and experimentation. It can also help prevent the spread of misinformation and promote the development of more accurate and reliable theories and explanations.