What is the Force of a Water Jet After Hitting a Block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Jet Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted on a block by a water jet. Initially, the water jet has a density and velocity V1, striking the block and splitting into two perpendicular flows with velocity V2. The force on the block is derived from the change in momentum of the mass flow, leading to the equation FBl = ρ ⋅ A ⋅ vx12, where vx12 is the initial velocity component in the x-direction. The confusion arises from the kinetic energy calculations, but the correct approach focuses on the mass flow's change in velocity. Ultimately, the force on the block is equal to the force exerted by the water jet in the opposite direction.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
This is a simple question that I should've known, but I'll ask. Fluid jet with density $ flows with velocity V1 before it strikes a block, then goes in two perpendicular directions, like left, right with the same velocity V2 in opposite directions. Find the force on the block. My try: The decrease in kinetic energy density is converted into excess pressure energy, so it should be, but I'm a silly unsure person. Initial energy/vol = $V1*V1/2, Final energy= twice $ V2*V2/2 since there are two final flows. So the difference multiplied area of impact, force. $(V*V1/2 - V2*V2)*area = force. But the correct answer, they say, is $(V1*V1 -V2*V2)* area.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The jet transports the mass flow m' with the velocity v1. Defining the direction of the jet in the first place in x-direction, after hitting the block, all the water flows in y-direction (perpendicular, so no component in x-direction). The force (in x-direction) is the difference of the mass flow's velocity in x-direction:

Fx = m' ⋅ (vx2 - vx1)

m' = ρ ⋅ vx1 ⋅ A → Fx = ρ ⋅ A ⋅ (vx22 - vx12)

vx22 = 0 → Fx = ρ ⋅ A ⋅ (0 - vx12) = - ρ ⋅ A ⋅ vx12

That's the force on the water jet, the same force on the block, but in opposite direction: FBl = ρ ⋅ A ⋅ vx12
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top