What is the formula for calculating G_T in line-of-sight antennas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bos1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antennas Line
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gain of transmitting antennas (G_T) in the context of a terrestrial microwave link, specifically focusing on line-of-sight transmission. Participants explore the relationship between various parameters affecting received power levels, including effective antenna area and free space loss, while addressing a homework problem involving a 100mW transmitter at 4GHz.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for received power (P_r) and expresses uncertainty about how to calculate G_T.
  • Another participant suggests that G_T is related to the spread angle of the microwave beam, proposing a relationship between beam cross-section and spherical area.
  • Clarifications are requested regarding the conversion of power units from dBW to dBm and the correct interpretation of the free space loss formula.
  • Concerns are raised about the formula for G_T, with one participant noting that it was derived from previous discussions and questioning its validity.
  • Participants discuss assumptions made about the antenna pattern spread over a distance of 40 km and the implications for G_T and G_R calculations.
  • One participant recalls a formula relating parabolic antenna diameter to beam spread, suggesting that the problem may hinge on this relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and assumptions regarding the calculations for G_T and G_R. There is no consensus on the correct approach or formula for determining G_T, and multiple competing views on the relationship between beam spread and antenna gain are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of certain parameters, such as the definition of variables in the free space loss formula and the assumptions regarding antenna pattern spread. The discussion highlights the complexity of calculating antenna gains in practical scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or professionals interested in microwave communication, antenna theory, and the practical challenges of calculating transmission parameters in line-of-sight scenarios.

bos1234
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In terrestrial microwave link, line-of-sight transmission limits the separation of transmitters and receivers to about 40km. If a 100mW transmitter at 4GHz is used with transmitting and receiving antennas of 0.5m^2 effective area, what is the received power level in dBm?

Homework Equations


I think this is the equation to use
P_{r}=P_{T}+G_{R}+G_{T}-L_{P}

P_t is given and G_R and L_P can be found. However, I am having trouble finding G_T?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is not the G_T related to the spread angle of the microwave beam. If all the P_T is concentrated in a beam instead of a sphere, the gain should be approximately equal to the reciprocal of cross section of the beam versus the area of the a sphere at the same radius.
 
thanks for the reply. I've attached a copy of my working out. I stated in my original post that L_p was found, however, it is only the free space loss of two isotropic antennas

fxyp8g.jpg
 
I think I follow your arithmetic but I'm not always sure why you are doing what you're doing.
1. 100 x 10^3 (100 mW) = -10 dBW not dB. However the answer is supposed to be in dBm.

2. Farther down you have L_P = (4 * pi * R / x)^2 What is x or is that lambda?

3. Above that you have G_T = (4 * pi * (R_RX)^2) / (pi * (R_TX)^2) How did you get that formula?

4. Are you assuming there is no spread in the antenna pattern over 40 km?
 
Hi
1. Sorry its dbW. I will change to dbm later this is not a issue

2.free space loss formula. Sorry about the writing. So I can find this out by substituting the appropriate values i.e. R is the distance between the 2 antennas and lamda can be caluclated since frequency and speed of light are known

3.This formula I sort of made up. There was a similar question posted by me in this thread
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=441793

I treated the satellite as the receiver, and the Earth as the transmitter. So numerator is the suraface area of the receiver whilst denominator is the cross-sectional area of the transmitter.

4. Yes I'm assuming no spread

Am I on the right track or not? I think the problem is with G_t and G_r?
 
3. I thought the formula might be related to the free space loss formula but then it would be 16 * pi^2 * R^2... This is what confused me.

4. From the information given I don't know how to calculate G_T and G_R. There is a formula, though I don't know it, that relates parabolic antenna diameter in wavelengths to beam spread. That's what I thought this problem was about. If I remember correctly in order to get a 1 deg spread, the antenna has to be about 10 wavelengths in diameter. Once you have the formula, then the loss would amount to what part of the cross sectional area of the transmitted beam does the receive antenna intercept at the distance given.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K