What is the formula for the quantity of radium left after t years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacobpm64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Half-life
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay of radium-226, specifically focusing on deriving a formula for the quantity of radium remaining after a certain number of years, given its half-life of 1620 years. Participants are exploring the mathematical representation of this decay process.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to formulate the quantity of radium left after a specified time using the concept of half-lives. There are discussions regarding the correct placement of the exponent in the formula, with some questioning the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct formula for the decay of radium, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between time and half-lives, and there is a recognition of the need to clarify the exponent's role in the formula.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the extent of guidance provided. The original poster's calculations are being scrutinized for accuracy, particularly in relation to the half-life concept.

Jacobpm64
Messages
235
Reaction score
0
(a) The half-life of radium-226 is 1620 years. Write a formula for the quantity, Q, of radium left after t years, if the initial quantity is Q0.

Check me on this one:
Q = (Q0 / 2(1620/t))

(b) What percentage of the original amount of radium is left after 500 years?

Check this one as well:
Q = (Q0 / 21620/500)
Q = (Q0 / 23.24)
Q = Q0 * 2-3.24
Q = Q0(0.1058)
10.6%
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 'a', the exponent on the 2 should reflect the number of half-lives, which is the ratio of t/T1/2, where T1/2 is the half-life.

So after 1 half-life, Q/Qo= 1/2, and after two half-lives, Q/Qo= (1/2)2 = 1/4, . . .

In the part 'b', the half-life of Rn-226 is 1620 years, the point at which 50% would be remaining, and 500 years is less than 1/3 of the half-life, so does 10.6% look right?
 
Last edited:
In other words, you have the exponent "upside down". It should be
t/1620, not 1620/t.
 
how's this?

(a) Q = (Q0 / 2t/1620)

(b) Q = (Q0 / 2500/1620)
Q = (Q0 / 20.3086...)
Q = Q0 * 2-0.3086...
Q = Q0(0.8074...)
80.7%
 
Better. :approve:
 
Do you understand why it is t/1620 rather than 1620/t? The "half life" of a substance is the time it takes to degrade to half its original value. Every time one "half life" passes, the amount is multiplied by 1/2: if the original amount is M, after one "half life" the amount is (1/2)M. After a second "half life", it is (1/2)((1/2)M)= (1/2)2M. After a third "half life" we multiply by 1/2 again: (1/2)((1/2)2M)= (1/2)3M. That is, the exponent just counts the number of "half lives" in the t years. If the "half life" is 1620, that "number of half lives" is t/1620 so the amount will be (1/2)t/1620M= M/2t/1620.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
28K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K