Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around determining the fourth term of an arithmetic sequence given the first three terms expressed in terms of a variable \( p \). Participants explore whether the sequence is indeed arithmetic and how to compute the fourth term based on the value of \( p \).
Discussion Character
- Homework-related
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant presents the problem of finding the fourth term of an arithmetic sequence defined by the terms \( p, 2p+6, \) and \( 5p-12 \).
- Another participant argues that the sequence is not an arithmetic progression (AP) unless \( p = 12 \), providing a calculation to support this claim.
- A later reply confirms that if \( p = 12 \), the difference between consecutive terms is 18, and uses the formula for the \( n \)-th term of an AP to calculate the fourth term as 66.
- There is a challenge to the assertion that the sequence is not an AP, with one participant insisting that it is, given the specific value of \( p \).
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants disagree on whether the sequence is an arithmetic progression for all values of \( p \) or only when \( p = 12 \). The discussion remains unresolved regarding the generality of the sequence's arithmetic nature.
Contextual Notes
The discussion highlights the dependence on the value of \( p \) and the conditions under which the sequence can be classified as arithmetic. There are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the implications of different values of \( p \).