What is the fourth term of an arithmetic sequence with specific given terms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the fourth term of an arithmetic sequence defined by the first three terms: p, 2p+6, and 5p-12. It is established that for the sequence to be arithmetic, the differences between consecutive terms must be constant. After solving the equation, it is concluded that p must equal 12 for the sequence to hold true, resulting in a consistent difference of 18. With p determined, the fourth term is calculated to be 66 using the formula for arithmetic sequences. The conclusion affirms that the sequence is indeed arithmetic when p is 12.
sabanation12
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Our 8th grade math counts team met today and I didnt know how to do this problem:

The first three terms of an arithmetic sequence are p, 2p+6, and 5p-12. What is the 4th term of this sequence?

Please explain how to do this.

Arigato!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
please help me
 
Its not an arithmetic progression... and don't bump. In an AP the difference between consecutive terms is constant (i.e. t1-t0=t2-t1 and so forth.) In this case (2p+6)-p=5p-12-(2p+6)
p+6=3p-18
2p=24
p=12
Only true when p=12. For all other cases it is not an AP.
 
so, is that the solution? p=12 and a difference of 18 between two consecutive numbers?

2p-12 <- simplifies to p, of course, if you know p=12
2p+6
5p-12
5p+6
8p-12
8p+6
.
.
.
 
hyurnat4 said:
Its not an arithmetic progression... and don't bump. In an AP the difference between consecutive terms is constant (i.e. t1-t0=t2-t1 and so forth.) In this case (2p+6)-p=5p-12-(2p+6)
p+6=3p-18
2p=24
p=12
Only true when p=12. For all other cases it is not an AP.

No I believe you are wrong, it IS an arithmetic sequence. Let me explain...

P does equal 12, and the difference between them is 18, so:

an = a1 + (n-1) * d

Plugging in numbers:

an = 12 + (4-1) * 18

so the fourth number is 66

Thanks for your help anyways :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top