What is the frictional force of a car driving around a curved road?

  • Thread starter Thread starter canadiantiger7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Curve
canadiantiger7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a car drives around a curve with a radius 410 m at a speed of 38 m/s. the road is banked at 5.1 degrees, and the car weighs 1400 kg. what if the frictional force of the car? at what speed could you drive around this curve so that the force of friction is zero?

I tried a few equations and got different answers, but none of them correct. any help is appreciated.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly have you tried? You have to show some work before you'll get any help.
 
i got the acceleration (V2/R) and then plugged that into get Fnet (m*a). but it did not work. that is what it said to do in the book though.
 
That is the net force on the car, but you need to determine where its coming from. Gravity always acts vertically with magnitude mg. The other two forces are the normal force of the road, which is perpendicular to the surface of the road, and the force of friction, which is parellel to the surface. These must be such that a) the vertical components add to zero, since there's no vertical acceleration and b) the horizontal components add to the net force, providing the centripetal force that keeps the car moving in a circle.
 
Hi Canadiantiger7,
I’m not getting what you exactly want. Please provide more details so that I can help you.
Thanks & Regards
Find the location of police speed traps using your mobile phones and other types of devices, take a look at http://www.trapster.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you bank a curve steeply enough, the normal force will supply the needed centripetal acceleration rather than the frictional force. This is the principle at work at high speed race tracks - this way, the limited friction between the tires/road can be used strictly for accelerating and braking, and not turning as well.

I would start with a free-body diagram if I were you, and then do what StatusX said above with regard to the horizontal and vertical forces. Note that the normal force does NOT point directly upward, as it would in other problems.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top