What is the general formula for the decomposition of a hydrate?

AI Thread Summary
The general formula for the decomposition of a hydrate is AB·xH2O, which breaks down into an anhydrous solid (AB) and water (H2O). For example, copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O) decomposes to yield CuSO4 and water. The discussion also notes that partial decomposition can occur, leading to varying amounts of water being released. Understanding hydrates and their decomposition is essential for chemistry applications. Overall, the key takeaway is the relationship between hydrates and their decomposition products.
KD
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What is the general formula for the decomposition of a hydrate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think it is? If you know the general formula for a hydrate, then it should be obvious.
 
We never really went over hydrates, but since some vocab words were thrown at me, the decomp would just be an anhydrous solid and water.
 
KD said:
We never really went over hydrates, but since some vocab words were thrown at me, the decomp would just be an anhydrous solid and water.

Exactly. So, if the fomula for the hydate is AB.xH2O (Ex: CuSO4.5H2O), then it will decompose to form...?

As a point of interest, it's also possible for partial decomposition to take place.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Solving Hydrate Formula w/ Titration: Na2CO3.xH20
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Can We Flatten Space with York Decomposition?
Replies
13
Views
949
Experimental details -- Heating hydrated barium nitrate
Replies
4
Views
3K
Chemistry Does hydrated Copper Chloride with 20 moles of H2O make sense?
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Coupling torsion to electromagnetism and torsion tensor decomposition
Replies
5
Views
971
How to Calculate the Empirical Formula of a Hydrate?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Calculating the Formula of a Hydrated Compound
Replies
3
Views
5K
How does concentration and stirring affect decomposition potential?
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Spectral Decomposition of the State Space
Replies
18
Views
2K
Thermal decomposition of group 1 and 2 nitrates
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top