What is the graph of y = log base 1 x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JinM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Log
AI Thread Summary
The logarithm to the base 1 is undefined because it leads to division by zero in its mathematical expression. Consequently, the graph of y = log1(x) is not a function but rather a vertical line at x = 1, indicating that it does not produce valid outputs for any other x values. The exponential form 1^y = x confirms that 1 raised to any power will always yield 1, reinforcing the idea that the only point on the graph is at (1, 1). The discussion highlights that while y = 1 is a valid function with a horizontal line graph, y = log1(x) does not represent a function at all. Overall, the concept of a graph for y = log1(x) is fundamentally flawed due to its undefined nature.
JinM
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I know that logarithms to the base 1 is undefined, due to the reason that:

\log_1{x} = \frac{\log_a{x}}{\log_a{1}}

And this leads to divison by zero, which is undefined.

There was a question in one of my textbooks that asked describe the graph that results if y = \log_1{x}. Is such a graph even possible?

If I switch this logarithm to exponential form I would get:

1^y = x

Now, is it possible that the graph could be y = 1 and x = 1? Since 1^y = x^1, y = 1 and x = 1.

Or is it the point of intersection of these two lines? If not, what is it?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, not "the" graph. You have two "functions" there and so two graphs. Yes, if y= log1(x) then x= 1y= 1 for all x. The reason I put "functions" in quotes above is that this is not actually a function: strictly speaking, log1(x) is not a function. But it is a relation and its graph is the vertical straight line x= 1.

y= 1x= 1 is a function: its graph is the horizontal straight line y= 1.
 
Well not even going into division by zero when considering a change of base, you should recognize that 1 raised to a power won't get you x, a variable.

1 raised to any power, whether fractional, negative, or worse, is just 1. So the graph will look like x = 1.
 
Wouldn't the expression y=log11 (or y=log1(x);x=1 for all x) be undifned too as logn1 is always zero; So y=log11 has both zero and one as an answer?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top