What is the Impedance of a Plane Wave Passing Through a Metal?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the impedance of a plane wave passing through a metal, expressed as Z = √(2ωε₀/σ) * (Z₀/(1-i)), where Z₀ is the impedance of free space and σ is conductivity. The initial attempt at the solution led to an impedance expression that lacked reference to conductivity. The user explored various equations related to wave propagation but struggled to connect them to the required form. Ultimately, the issue was resolved by correcting the equation for the speed of light in terms of permeability and permittivity. The user expressed relief at having learned electromagnetism in SI units, which aided in their understanding.
bayners123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A plane wave is passing through a metal. Show that the impedance Z can be given by
Z = \sqrt{ \frac{2 \omega \epsilon _0} {\sigma} } \frac{Z_0}{1-i} where Zo is the impedance of free space and sigma is the conductivity.

You may assume that E is polarised in the x direction.

Homework Equations



Z_0 = \sqrt{ \frac{\epsilon_r \epsilon_0}{\mu_r \mu_0}}

E_x = E_0 e^{i(\omega t - \tilde{k} x)}
where \tilde{k} = k - iK

The Attempt at a Solution



I've managed to get to the impedance in the form:
Z = \frac{ \mu_r \mu_0 \omega }{ k - iK }
but this doesn't have any reference to the conductivity in it and I can't see how to get to the required equation from it. I thought to use \frac{\omega}{k} = \frac{c}{n} = \frac{c}{\sqrt{\epsilon_r \mu_r}} but it didn't seem to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, by subbing back into the wave equation I've got to
Z = \sqrt{ \frac{2 \omega}{\sigma \epsilon_r \epsilon_0}} \frac{\mu_r \mu_0}{1-i} Z_0
which is nearly there but I can't see the last bit..

---

EDIT: Solved. I was just being silly as usual: I had the wrong equation for the speed of light in terms of mu and epsilon. Please delete
 
Last edited:
Reasons like this are why I'm glad that I was taught EM in SI units over CGS, everyone knows c from curlB. :p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top