HallsofIvy said:
I very much doubt you are saying what you really mean.
\int \frac{dy}{f'(x)}= \frac{y}{f'(x)}+ C
of course.
If you want to solve
x= \int\frac{dy}{f'(x)}
for x, that will depend upon exactly what f(x) is.
But I suspect you are really asking:
"By the 'Fundamental Theorem of Calculus', we know that
\int f'(x) dx= f(x)+ C
Is there a similar formula for
\int \frac{dx}{f'(x)}?"
And the answer is, "No, there isn't."
Well... I found a cool trick to find the derivative of the inverse of functions
What I originally took the derivative of y:
dy/dx = f'(x)dx
Then I flipped the derivative:
dx/dy = 1/f'(x)dx If we solved for y and took the derivative of it with respect to y, you would get the answer to this equation
I then multiplied it by dy on both sides:
dx = dy/f'(x)dx
And now I hope I that I can find something out by doing the integral of this function. I'm not worrying about c because I can obtain it from from the f(x) function, which I know what it is.
When I plug in f(x)= y = x^3 + x into your equation:
I get x= y/(3x^2 + 1) + c
and if I solve for y I get
y= 3x^3 + x -c
no constant can make 3x^3 + x - c = y = x^3 + x true for all real number values for x.
If sub in y = x^3 + x and f'(x) = 3x^2 + 1 I will get 0 = -2x^3 +3x^2 + 1
Hopefully I can use integration by parts to solve for x, especially with high power polynomial equations. We may be able to solve for it if we keep on doing integration by parts or any other tricks (which I don't know about) to get every thing in terms of derivatives of the function. Since you can integrate forever, I'm hopping that we can eventually reach a point were the remaining integral terms will eventually reach a integral that requires so many derivatives (for example f'''''''''''''''''''''(x)) that any polynomial can be reduced to zero, therefore "killing" the integral since it f''''''''''...''''''''(x) = 0.
I haven't considered what the bounds of the integration would be, but I'm trying to solve the integration pattern problem first. Maybe it involves some higher calculus that I haven't taken yet.
One last note, since f(x) is some polynomial, I made dx = 1 and I choose f'''''(x) notation because using an actual function would be hectic, and I wanted to see a pattern, so that I may apply this to something like x^1000 + 10x^546 + .999x^3154 ... and eventually have everything in terms of the function and it's derivatives and also so that I may take 3155 derivatives on the last integral(s) (if they exist) and kill or reduce the function to zero.