What is the Inverse of a 2D Function?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter n0ya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Function Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The 2D function f(x,y) = a + bx + cy + dxy does not possess an inverse due to its mapping characteristics. Specifically, the example f(x,y) = 2 + x illustrates that multiple input pairs (0,0) and (0,1) yield the same output, violating the definition of a function's inverse. Generally, a function mapping from f: ℝ² → ℝ cannot have a continuous inverse, as it would imply a homeomorphic relationship between the plane and a line, which is impossible. In contrast, a function mapping from f: ℝ² → ℝ² may have a continuous inverse, contingent upon the specific properties of the function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of function definitions and properties
  • Familiarity with concepts of continuity and homeomorphism
  • Knowledge of multivariable calculus
  • Basic understanding of inverse functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the concept of homeomorphism in topology
  • Learn about inverse functions in the context of ℝ² to ℝ² mappings
  • Investigate specific examples of functions that have continuous inverses
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in the properties of functions and their inverses in multivariable contexts.

n0ya
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a 2D function f:

f(x,y) = a + bx + cy + dxy

what is the inverse of this function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi n0ya! :smile:

The function you mention will never have an inverse.

For example, if f(x,y)=2+x, then f cannot have an inverse since f(0,0)=2=f(0,1). Thus (0,0) and (0,1) are both being sent to 2. But then the inverse needs to send 2 to both (0,0) and (0,1), but this is impossible for a function.

In general, your function is one [itex]f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex], it can have no (continuous) inverse since otherwise the plane would be homeomorphic to the line. And this cannot be.


If you had a function [itex]f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2[/itex] then you might have a continuous inverse. But even then this depends of the function f...
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K