What Is the Jumper’s Speed at 12.5 m Above the Water?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a bungee jumper at 12.5 m above the water using conservation of energy principles. The jumper, with a mass of 64.5 kg, falls from a height of 48 m, and the unstretched bungee cord is 10.1 m long, with a force constant of 65.5 N/m. An initial attempt calculated the jumper's speed as 5.96 m/s, but the correct speed is 6.37 m/s. The discrepancy was attributed to a computational error in determining the stretch of the bungee cord, which was corrected from 25.5 m to 25.4 m. Accurate calculations are crucial in physics problems involving energy conservation.
sillydude
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bungee jumper of mass 64.5 kg (including safety gear) is
standing on a platform 48.0 m above a river. The length of
the unstretched bungee cord is 10.1 m. The force constant
of the cord is 65.5 N/m. The jumper falls from rest and just
touches the water at a speed of zero. The cord acts like an
ideal spring. Use conservation of energy to determine the
jumper’s speed at a height of 12.5 m above the water on
the first fall.



The Attempt at a Solution



so I decided that Eg(at the top of the platform)=Ek+Ee+Eg'(12.5 above water floor)

so for h initial i used 48m...h'= 12.5m and x(stretch of the cord)= 25.5m
therefore
mg(48)=.5k(25.5^2)+.5mv^2+mg(12.5)

i solved for V and got 5.96m/s, the answer is 6.37m/s...please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your error is merely computational. I get the stretch of the cord to be 25.4m, not 25.5, which apparently has a large difference because the value is squared.
 
Nabeshin said:
I think your error is merely computational. I get the stretch of the cord to be 25.4m, not 25.5, which apparently has a large difference because the value is squared.

bingo!..thanks a lot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top