What is the limit of (x/x+1)^x as x tends to infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter l33t_V
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The limit of (x/(x+1))^x as x approaches infinity is e^-1. The initial confusion about the expression was clarified, emphasizing the need for proper parentheses in the denominator. After simplifying the expression, it was shown that (1/(1+1/x))^x approaches e^-1 as x tends to infinity. The discussion confirmed that the limit converges to e^-1, resolving any misunderstandings. Thus, the final result is that the limit is e^-1.
l33t_V
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with finding the limit of (x/x+1)^x as x tends to infinity
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The limit is infinity, unless of course this is what you meant:
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x}{x + 1}\right )^x

If you want to write the quotient of x and x + 1, put parentheses around what goes in the denominator, like so: x/(x + 1).
 
unless of course this is what you meant:
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x}{x + 1}\right )^x

The reciprocal is
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x+1}{x}\right )^x
Can you do that limit?
 
Mark44 said:
The limit is infinity, unless of course this is what you meant:
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x}{x + 1}\right )^x

If you want to write the quotient of x and x + 1, put parentheses around what goes in the denominator, like so: x/(x + 1).
Yes, i meant (x/(x+1))^x
 
Last edited:
Never mind, I solved it.

(x/(x(1+1/x)))^x = (1/(1+1/x))^x = 1^x/(1+1/x)^x where 1^x = 1 and (1+(1/x))^x as x tends to inf = e^1

therefore as x tends to infinity the function tends to e^-1
 
\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (x/x+1)^x= \lim _{x\rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{-1}{x+1})^{-(x+1)\frac{x}{-(x+1)}})=\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^\frac{x}{-(x+1)}}=e^{-1}
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top