What is the limit of (x/x+1)^x as x tends to infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter l33t_V
  • Start date Start date
l33t_V
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with finding the limit of (x/x+1)^x as x tends to infinity
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The limit is infinity, unless of course this is what you meant:
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x}{x + 1}\right )^x

If you want to write the quotient of x and x + 1, put parentheses around what goes in the denominator, like so: x/(x + 1).
 
unless of course this is what you meant:
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x}{x + 1}\right )^x

The reciprocal is
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x+1}{x}\right )^x
Can you do that limit?
 
Mark44 said:
The limit is infinity, unless of course this is what you meant:
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \left ( \frac{x}{x + 1}\right )^x

If you want to write the quotient of x and x + 1, put parentheses around what goes in the denominator, like so: x/(x + 1).
Yes, i meant (x/(x+1))^x
 
Last edited:
Never mind, I solved it.

(x/(x(1+1/x)))^x = (1/(1+1/x))^x = 1^x/(1+1/x)^x where 1^x = 1 and (1+(1/x))^x as x tends to inf = e^1

therefore as x tends to infinity the function tends to e^-1
 
\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (x/x+1)^x= \lim _{x\rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{-1}{x+1})^{-(x+1)\frac{x}{-(x+1)}})=\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} e^\frac{x}{-(x+1)}}=e^{-1}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top