What is the magnitude of angular acceleration upon release?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration of a dumbbell consisting of two point masses (12 kg and 6 kg) attached to a negligible mass rod, pivoted at its center. The user initially struggles with determining the moment of inertia (I) and the correct application of torque. After some calculations, they derive the angular acceleration (alpha) as 13.1 radians/sec². It is clarified that the position of the center of mass can be considered, but it does not significantly affect the outcome in this scenario. The final consensus confirms the calculated angular acceleration is correct.
justagirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
A dumbbell consists of a slender rod of negligible mass and small spheres attached to each end with mass 12-kg and 6-kg respectively. It is pivoted at its center about a fixed horizontal frictionless axle and initially held in place horizontally. The length of the rod is 50 centimeters and connects the centers of the two spheres. The dumbell is then released.

What is the magnitude of angular acceleration immediately upon release?

I wrote down torque = I(alpha)
alpha = torque / I = 12(0.5) - 6(0.5) / I

I am stuck here. And what would "I" be in this case since the rod is neglible mass and we don't know the radius of the spheres?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
justagirl said:
I am stuck here. And what would "I" be in this case since the rod is neglible mass and we don't know the radius of the spheres?
Treat the spheres as point masses. What's the rotational inertia of a point mass fixed a certain distance from an axis?
 
Okay... treating them as point masses:

alpha = torque / I

= (m1)gr - (m2)gr / m1(r^2) + m2(r^2)

= 12(9.8)(0.25) - 6(9.8)(0.25) / ((.25^2) (m1 + m2))

= 13.1

Is that right? So the position of the center of mass doesn't really matter in this case?

Thanks!
 
justagirl said:
= 13.1

Is that right?
Yes, in units of radians/sec^2.
So the position of the center of mass doesn't really matter in this case?
I'm not sure what you mean. If you had wished, you could have calculated the torque by considering the mass as concentrated at the center of mass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top