What is the maths behind projectiles (including air resistance)?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical modeling of projectile motion, specifically considering the effects of air resistance. Participants explore how to approach the problem of determining the time a projectile is in the air and the horizontal distance traveled, while incorporating air resistance into their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a specific example involving a football thrown at an angle, seeking guidance on how to incorporate air resistance into the calculations.
  • Another participant references Stokes' Law and provides links, though it is noted that this information does not directly address predicting projectile movement after accounting for air resistance.
  • A participant suggests that formulating a system of differential equations using Newton's second law is necessary for predicting movement under linear drag conditions.
  • There is a discussion about expressing instantaneous acceleration in terms of velocity and the challenge of deriving acceleration/velocity as functions of time.
  • A later reply provides the equations of motion split into vertical and horizontal components, indicating that both are second-order differential equations with constant coefficients that can be solved using separation of variables.
  • One participant expresses satisfaction in finding the answer they were looking for after performing integration and differentiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, as there are multiple viewpoints on how to incorporate air resistance and the mathematical methods to use. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific steps to take in solving the projectile motion problem with air resistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for differential equations and the challenge of expressing variables as functions of time, indicating potential limitations in their current understanding or approach to the problem.

Georgepowell
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
E.g. A football of mass 1kg is thrown with a speed of 10m/s at an angle of 30 degrees from a horizontal plane. Take air resistance (in Newtons) as 1/15 th of the speed of the ball in the exact opposite direction that the ball is traveling. How long is the ball in the air? and how far (horizontally) has it traveled at the point of landing?

I understand how to figure it out if I can ignore air resistance, but how would I answer this question?

I am not so much interested in the answer, but more how to figure out the answer, I have just given you that example so it gives you something to answer if you need an example.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That tells me how to figure out the air resistance, and not how to predict its movement after I know it.

Anybody else?
 
Georgepowell said:
That tells me how to figure out the air resistance, and not how to predict its movement after I know it.

Anybody else?
One would need to formulate a system of differential equations using Newton's second law. The exercise is fairly straight forward for the case of linear drag (as you have described in your opening post).
 
Ok, so from what I already know I can write the instantaneous acceleration in terms of the velocity at that time, but I can't seem to figure out how to have acceleration/velocity as a function of time.

Any help on this?
 
Georgepowell said:
Ok, so from what I already know I can write the instantaneous acceleration in terms of the velocity at that time, but I can't seem to figure out how to have acceleration/velocity as a function of time.

Any help on this?
We have Newton's second law:

[tex]\mathbf{F} = m\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{dt^2}[/tex]

Where r = xi + yj is position, where x=x(t) and y=y(t). Splitting into vertical and horizontal components:

[tex]-mg -\kappa y^\prime = my^{\prime\prime}[/tex]

[tex]-\kappa x^\prime = mx^{\prime\prime}[/tex]

Where [itex]\kappa = 1/15[/itex]. In canonical form:

[tex]y^{\prime\prime} + \frac{\kappa}{m} y^\prime = g[/tex]

[tex]x^{\prime\prime} + \frac{\kappa}{m} x^\prime = 0[/tex]

Both of the above are second order differential equations with constant coefficients. Both are separable and straightforward to solve.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K