What is the maximum energy density of EM radiation and its effects?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the maximum energy density of electromagnetic (EM) radiation and its effects, particularly in the context of photon density, radiation pressure, and hypothetical scenarios involving extreme conditions. Participants explore theoretical limits, physical implications, and the behavior of photons under high energy densities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether there is a limit to EM radiation energy density, suggesting that the Pauli Exclusion Principle does not apply to photons and inquiring about potential physical limits aside from black hole formation.
  • Another participant responds that aside from black holes, there is no known limit on photon density, mentioning that high energy densities could lead to the production of electrons and positrons.
  • A participant raises a scenario involving being near a nuclear fusion explosion in a vacuum, asking if one would feel any force from the intense EM radiation and whether there would be momentum transfer from photons.
  • One participant confirms that light would exert significant pressure and explains that pressure can be calculated as intensity divided by the speed of light, providing a record intensity value and corresponding pressure level.
  • Concerns are expressed about the vaporization of materials due to high radiation pressure, with implications for containment and the nature of pressure experienced in extreme conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of limits to EM radiation energy density, with differing views on the implications of high photon densities and the effects of radiation pressure. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nuances of momentum transfer and the physical effects of extreme EM radiation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexities of high energy densities, including the potential for particle production and the limitations of containment materials under extreme conditions. The discussion includes assumptions about idealized scenarios and does not resolve the mathematical or physical implications of these conditions.

easyrider
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Hi yall, I have a few questions in regards to EM radiation and photon density, or energy density; not sure what exactly the correct term would be here.

(1) Anyway, first off, excluding the possibility that a black hole would form, is there anything that would limit EM radiation energy density to a certain amount? Because as far as I know, the Pauli Exclusion Principle doesn't apply to photons. I would think a black hole would eventually form(?) but besides that, is there anything that puts an upper limit on how many photons you can cram into a "box" so to speak? Or should I say is there a limit to energy density assuming the energy is only EM radiation?

Take for instance a laser with a 1 meter aperture/diameter beam, would there ever come a point where you could not possibly increase the energy of the beam due to physical effects? Ignoring engineering difficulties and black holes of course..

(2) Also, what are the physical effects of very high radiation pressure? Like for example you have a box at which inside is full of EM radiation at Planck energy density, would it "feel" like air pressure, trying to burst apart? Or would the photons be fully "content" to stay at this density? Obviously "feel" and "content" do not apply to non-living things but that's the best wording I could think of.

Thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart from the possible formation of black holes, there is no known limit on the photon density - if the energy density gets too high, you start producing electrons and positrons (or even heavier particles), but that should be fine.

Also, what are the physical effects of very high radiation pressure?
It would vaporize any container, with a shockwave expanding at nearly the speed of light.
 
Thanks.

Okay it would vaporize the container, let put me put the question this way. If you were somehow put on the surface of a planet with no atmosphere, or heck just in the vacuum of space period, and you were very near to a nuclear fusion explosion, or really any source of a huge amount of EM radiation being released all at once. Remember, this is in a vacuum, aside from the fact that you would vaporize very quickly, would you feel any type of force pushing on you? Obviously photons have a very small amount of momentum, but magnified to a huge extreme, would it feel similar to a air pressure wave? Ignoring being vaporized for a second, would there be any momentum transfer to speak of?

Thanks and sorry for the dumb questions.

And I've heard of the laser propulsion drive concepts but IIRC they use the vaporization of the surface of the pusher plate/propellant to get the thrust. I am strictly asking about a photons ability to transfer momentum at very high energies/density. Just wondering, even though its meaningless when confronted with the fact that vaporization will occur long before any momentum transfer.
 
The light would have a significant pressure, sure. The evaporating material expands outwards (and not inwards) as a result.
Pressure is just intensity divided by c. I found 2*1022W/cm2 as record intensity http://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/print/volume-44/issue-4/world-news/ultrafast-lasers-michigan-group-achieves-laser-intensity-record.html , this corresponds to a pressure of 6.7*1017 Pa - more than in the core of our sun. This pressure lasts for an extremely short time, however.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K