What Is the Maximum Epsilon for a Neighborhood to Fit Within a Triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter philosophking
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the maximum epsilon neighborhood around the point (3, 5/2) that fits within a triangle defined by the vertices (2,0), (2,2), and (4,4). Participants suggest that the epsilon neighborhood can be visualized as a circle, and the problem involves determining the radius where the circle is tangent to the triangle's sides. The approach includes calculating the perpendicular distance from the point to each side of the triangle and identifying the shortest distance to determine the maximum radius. A key insight is that the correct approach involves ensuring the line segment from the point to the triangle's edge is perpendicular. The final answer for the maximum epsilon is 1/(2*sqrt(5)).
philosophking
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. Thanks in advance for your help. I've been working on this problem that is in my analysis book and I'm not sure how to go about it.

I'm required to find the supremum of the epsilon neighborhood around the point (3, 5/2) such that the entire neighborhood is contained is the set S = {the closed triangle with vertices (2,0), (2,2), (4,4)}.

Just so that non-analysis acquainted people can still help me: the epsilon neighborhood that they are asking for is basically a circle with some radius epsilon. They want me to find this radius, I think.

So I thought about taking the equation of the sphere around this point (3, 5/2) and finding where it intersects each of the sides (using the equation of a line), but I ended up going nowhere with this. I was going to take the derivative and find the max or something... I just got lost.

I was also thinking about the idea that the circle would be tangent to one of these lines at the point where the radius is perpendicular to that side of the triangle. So I found the equation of a couple of the lines and took the negative reciprocal, and set those equal to the sphere equation, but that didn't work either! Please help me. Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, of course the circle will have to be tangent to the edge of the triangle it touches. If it weren't, then the edge would go through the circle. In other words, any line that touches a circle at only one point is tangent to it, and you can easily verify this. You can show it by considering a circle centered about the origin of radius r, and a line going through the point (0, r). Show that it touches the circle at only one point iff it's slope is zero, i.e. if y = mx + r is the equation of the line, and y² + x² = r² is the equation of the circle, then this system of two equations has some solution for x not equal to zero iff m is not equal to zero.

To solve this problem, find the point (a, b) found on one of the arms of the triangle such that (a - 3, b - 2.5) is perpendicular to the arm and it's length is shortest. You have three sides of the triangle, so you will have three values for (a, b). You want to choose the (a, b) such that the length of (a - 3, b - 2.5) is minimized.

I will find one of the (a,b) for you, and it's length.

One the side connecting (2,2) and (2,0), the point (a,b) would satisfy:

(a - 3, b - 2.5) . (2 - 2, 2 - 0) = 0 (the dot product of two perpendicular vectors is zero)
(a - 3, b - 2.5) . (0, 2) = 0
2(b - 2.5) = 0
b = 2.5

Now (a, b) has to be on the line segment joining (2,2) and (2, 0), so (2,2)-(a,b) has to be collinear with (a,b)-(2,0), i.e., for some real k:

(2,2)-(a,b) = k[(a,b) - (2,0)]
(2-a,2-b) = (ka - 2k, kb)
(2-a,-0.5) = (ka - 2k, 2.5k)

So k = -0.2, so:

2 - a = (-0.2)a - 2(-0.2)
2 - a = 0.4 - 0.2a
1.6 = 0.8a
a = 2

Now, your intuition should already have told you that 'a' would be 2, and that since the edge connecting (2,0) and (2,2) is vertical, that the perpendicular segment from (3, 2.5) and that edge would be horizontal, so b would be 2.5. Also, note how (a,b) = (2, 2.5) is not even on the edge connecting (2,0) and (2,2) (it's above it). If you drew a picture, your intuition would also have told you that this is the wrong edge to be looking at. The length of (a - 3,b - 2.5) = (-1, 0) is:

\sqrt{(a-3)^2 + (b-2.5)^2} = \sqrt{(-1)^2 + 0^2} = \sqrt{1} = 1

That calculation was entirely pointless except to show you how it's done just in case you didn't know (but I bet you did). So do the same for the other two sides, and the one with the smallest length will be your \epsilon.
 
Thank you very much for your help I ended up making some silly errors when figuring out the equation of the line. In particular, I said that the equation of the line connecting (2,0) and (4,4) was 2x, not 2x-4. This through my calculations off quite a bit.

Once again though, thank you very much for your help on this problem. I pretty much gave up on working in it until I saw your post. Just for curiosity the answer is 1/(2*sqrt(5))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top