I What is the maximum height reached by an object with air resistance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height reached by an object projected vertically into the air while accounting for air resistance. The initial equation of motion is presented, leading to a derived velocity function and an expression for the time taken to reach maximum height. Participants express concerns about potential errors in integration and unit consistency, suggesting that the problem may require numerical rather than analytical solutions. A key realization involves correcting the use of trigonometric identities, specifically distinguishing between cosine and secant, which affects the final calculations. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of integrating motion equations with air resistance and the importance of careful mathematical manipulation.
nos
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I was playing around with some equations regarding air resistance. I tried to calculate the height that is reached by an object that is projected vertically into the air. However something seems to go wrong when integrating.

Starting with the equation of motion
\begin{align*}
m\frac{dv}{dt}=-mg-kv^2.
\end{align*}
Setting \begin{align*}a=\sqrt{\frac{km}{g}},\\
v(0)=v_0.
\end{align*}
Then the solution to this differential equation is
\begin{align*}
v(t)=\frac{\tan{(\arctan{(av_0)}-gt})}{a}.
\end{align*}
Then the time it take to slow the object to a standstill(where it reaches maximum height) is
\begin{align*}
t_{end}=\frac{\arctan{(av_0)}}{g}.
\end{align*}

So the distance traveled in this time can be found by integrating the velocity function over this time.

\begin{align*}
h&=\int_0^{t_{end}}\frac{\tan{(\arctan{(av_0)}-gt})}{a}dt\\
&=\frac{1}{ga}(\ln{\cos{(arctan{(av_0)}-gt_{end})}}-\ln{\cos{(\arctan{(av_0)}}}.
\end{align*}
I did not even bother going through with it, it's going to come out negative.

I'm not actually sure this is the right antiderivative. Or maybe I lost a minus sign somewhere. I can't spot it.
Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Something went wrong with units, the formulas cannot be right.
 
How are you sure that you can solve this analytically? I think it can only be solved numerically. I could be wrong though.
 
It's solvable by separation of constants:
$$-\frac{m}{mg+k v^2} \mathrm{d} v=\mathrm{d} t.$$
Because we have
$$\int \mathrm{d} v \frac{m}{mg+k v^2} =\frac{1}{g} \int \mathrm{d} v \frac{1}{1+(\sqrt{k/(mg)} v)^2} = \sqrt{\frac{m}{gk}} \arctan \left (\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}} v \right),$$
we get
$$\sqrt{\frac{m}{gk}} \left [\arctan \left (\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}} v \right)-\arctan \left (\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}} v_0 \right) \right]=-t.$$
This gives you ##v(t)##. Integrating once more gives ##h(t)##.
 
This is the correct answer for the velocity function. I realized I missed a constant and instead \begin{align*}
a=\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}}\end{align*}

So \begin{align*}
v(t)=\sqrt{\frac{mg}{k}}\tan{\Big[\arctan{\Big(\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}}v_0\Big)}-\sqrt{\frac{gk}{m}}t\Big]}
\end{align*}
Integrating this
\begin{align*}
h&=\sqrt{\frac{mg}{k}}\int_0^{t_{end}} \tan{\Big[\arctan{\Big(\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}}v_0\Big)}-\sqrt{\frac{gk}{m}}t\Big]}dt\\
&=\frac{m}{k}\Big[\ln{\cos{0}}-\ln{\cos{\Big(\arctan{\big(\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}}v_0\big)}\Big)}}\Big]\\
&=-\ln{\Big(\sqrt{1+\frac{k}{mg}v_0^2}\Big)}.
\end{align*}

This will give me a negative height, which is impossible.
 
Last edited:
The cosine of something cannot exceed 1, so the logarithm of it has to be negative or zero. The second last line is always zero or positive, not sure what happened afterwards.
 
Oh right thanks, so the second last line is positive. I tried to simplify the answer a bit more and this is where I think made a mistake.
Imagine a triangle with angle θ.
\begin{align*}
\theta=\arctan{\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}}v_0}
\end{align*}
Then the opposite and adjacent sides are
\begin{align*}
O&=\sqrt{\frac{k}{mg}}v_0\\
A&=1
\end{align*}
Then the cosine of this configuration must be \begin{equation*}\cos{\theta}= \frac{\sqrt{1+\frac{k}{mg}v_o^2}}{1}\end{equation*}

Edit: I see this is the secant and not cosine haha, so that will account for the minus sign :) thanks for replying
 
In the last equation there is a square root missing and you have to swap numerator and denominator. Taken out of the log that gives a factor -1/2 which makes the result positive.
 
the formulas could be much shorter

Let ##s## be the path, ##\dot s=v##. Then equation
nos said:
mdvdt=−mg−kv2.​
takes the form
##m\frac{dv}{ds}v=-mg-kv^2## and
separating variables we get
$$s-s_0=\int_{v_0}^0\frac{mvdv}{-mg-kv^2}=-\frac{m}{2k}\ln(mg+kv^2)\Big|_{v_0}^0$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, nasu and Delta2

Similar threads

Back
Top