What is the maximum period of revolution for a cone filled with water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vipulgoyal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum period of revolution for a cone filled with water, focusing on the conditions under which the water remains inside the cone. Participants express confusion about the approach, debating whether to calculate the minimum velocity at the top of the cone first. They suggest using centripetal acceleration and the relationship between angular velocity and period, while also discussing the importance of ensuring the reaction force is sufficient to prevent the water from spilling. The conversation highlights the need to clarify the formulas involved, particularly the relationships between velocity, radius, and angular velocity. Ultimately, the goal is to derive the time period based on these principles.
vipulgoyal
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A SMALL CONE FILLED WITH WATER OF RADIUS 4M AND THE WATER DOESNT FALL DOWN. WHAT MUST BE THE MAXIMUM PERIOD OF REVOLUTION


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I AM CONFUSED!

HOW TO APPROACH THE PROBLEM? SHOULD FIRST CALCULATE THE MINIMUM VELOCITY AT TOP AND THEN FIND OUT THE t USING W=2PIE/T? (the answer is not cuming using this approach
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi vipulgoyal! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and a pi: π :wink:)

is this movement in a vertical circle?

the water will fall out if the reaction force is zero …

use F = ma and centripetal acceleration :smile:
 


the speed at the top is √gl now have to find time period

the answer doest come by this method ω= 2π /T
ω =r x v
 
hi vipulgoyal! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
vipulgoyal said:
the speed at the top is √gl now have to find time period

yup! :biggrin:
the answer doest come by this method ω= 2π /T
ω =r x v

("doest"? :confused:)

nooo :redface:

v = ωr :rolleyes:
 


yeah thnx... i always get mixed up in these formulas...
 
me too :redface:, so i check by using dimensions :-p

v is L/T, r is L, ω is 1/T :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top