What is the meaning of BPS D-branes ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chongchong
  • Start date Start date
chongchong
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the meaning of "BPS D-branes"?

I often read the statement like the following;

"A state of D-branes parallely pleced in flat 10 dim space is a BPS state, because some of superchages remain unbroken."


I think that every "BPS state" is one member(state) of a certain BPS multiplet.
So my question is:

Which state of the BPS multiplet dose a state of parallely pleced D-branes correspond to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


chongchong said:
I often read the statement like the following;

"A state of D-branes parallely pleced in flat 10 dim space is a BPS state, because some of superchages remain unbroken."


I think that every "BPS state" is one member(state) of a certain BPS multiplet.
So my question is:

Which state of the BPS multiplet dose a state of parallely pleced D-branes correspond to?

A "BPS State" is a solution to the field equations that preserves some (but not all) of the supersymmetries of the field equations. Branes are BPS solutions of the supergravity equations under this definition, and that is why you see statements like the one you quoted.

The "BPS Multiplet" you are referring to would correspond to what you get if you act on the stack of branes with one of the unbroken supersymmetry transformations. This would probably give you things like translations and rotations of the stack, etc.
 


Thank!

chongchong said:
I often read the statement like the following;

"A state of D-branes parallely pleced in flat 10 dim space is a BPS state, because some of superchages remain unbroken."


I think that every "BPS state" is one member(state) of a certain BPS multiplet.
So my question is:

Which state of the BPS multiplet dose a state of parallely pleced D-branes correspond to?
 


The "BPS Multiplet" you are referring to would correspond to what you get if you act on the stack of branes with one of the unbroken supersymmetry transformations. This would probably give you things like translations and rotations of the stack, etc.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top