What is the meaning of this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter josus10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
josus10
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Thinking back to my intro to modern physics course a while back, one particular equation always sticks out to me but I never quite understood how to interpret it properly. We were doing some basic QM and looking at the normalization of the wave function in 1D. It looked something like this;

∫|Ψ(x)|2dx

If I remember correctly but I don't have my book with me. The limits of integration were from -∞ to ∞ and then were readjusted to be from 0 to L (L being the length of the box or well.) I'm hoping that I didnt make a mistake typing it but provided I didn't, what is the meaning of the infinite limits of integration? I have always been thinking of it as the definition of existence, where the infinite bounds represent the bounds of the universe, but the more I think of it that way the less sense it makes. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave function is defined over all of space, therefore the integration has to be done from -∞ to ∞. Thinking of it as "the bound of the universe" is not helpful, as that runs into conceptual problems. It is in a sense a mathematical construct, but it works very well.
 
  • Like
Likes josus10
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top