What is the Minimum Angle for a Ladder to Not Slip Against a Wall?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shards5
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum angle for a ladder leaning against a frictionless wall, given a static friction coefficient of 0.41. The user initially attempts to apply the sum of forces and torques but arrives at an incorrect angle of 0.014 degrees. Key errors identified include confusion between cotangent and tangent functions and ensuring the calculator is set to degree mode. The correct relationship involves understanding that the ratio of forces should lead to the cotangent of the angle rather than the tangent. Clarifications on these mathematical principles are essential for solving the problem accurately.
shards5
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So the original problem goes as the following.

A uniform ladder of mass (m) and length (L) leans against a frictionless wall, see figure. If the coefficient of static friction between the ladder and the ground is 0.41, what is the minimum angle (q) between the ladder and the floor at which the ladder will not slip?

And I get the whole concept behind how to do it which is basically using sum of the forces and sum of the torques but my math seems to be wrong and different from the solutions I found online (my answer was 0.014 degrees which is obviously wrong). So can you tell me where I messed up in my math?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Sum of the forces = 0
Nw = Normal force done on the ladder by the wall
Nf = Normal force done on the ladder by the floor
cg = Center of gravity (bad habit of mine that I use to distinguish between my other mg)

x: Nw - Fs = ma (a = 0 thus ma = 0)
y: Nf - cg = 0

Thus:
Nf = cg
Fs = Nw

Sum of the Torques = 0
Set the axis of rotation at the base of the ladder
Nw sin(theta) - (g sin(theta))/2 = 0
Substituting Nw for Friction static and then substituting Friction static with coefficient of static friction times cg I get the following:
uk cg sin (theta) - (cg cos(theta))/2 = 0
Canceling out the cg I get the following:
uk sin (theta) - (cos(theta))/2 = 0
Now this is where I screw up so can someone explain how I screwed up.
Moved cos to the other side
uk sin(theta) = (cos(theta))/2
Multiplied 2 to get rid of the 1/2 on the right side
2uk sin(theta) = cos(theta)
Divided by sin (theta)
2 uk = cos(theta)/sin(theta)
Which becomes
2 uk = arctan(theta)
Thus
theta = tan(2uk)


Thanks for your help and sorry for asking for putting out so much detail for something so simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shards5 said:
2 uk = cos(theta)/sin(theta)
This is good. (Really, μs, since it's static friction.)
Which becomes
2 uk = arctan(theta)
Careful: cos/sin = cot, not tan.
Thus
theta = tan(2uk)
(1) Fix the mistake I pointed out regarding cot vs. tan.
(2) Make sure your calculator is set to degree mode and not radians. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top