What is the minimum normal force he must exert?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum normal force a 50.0 kg climber must exert in a vertical chimney, the net force must equal zero since the climber is stationary. The climber's weight, calculated as mass times gravity, is 490 N. The static friction forces from the climber's shoes and back, influenced by their respective coefficients of friction (0.90 and 0.65), must also be considered. The friction forces can be calculated using the formula Ffr = µsFN, where FN is the normal force. The discussion emphasizes the need for a detailed calculation to ensure that the friction forces adequately counterbalance the climber's weight.
physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
The 50.0 kg climber is supported in the "chimney" by the friction forces exerted on his shoes and back. The static coefficients of friction between his shoes and the wall, and between his back and the wall, are 0.90 and 0.65, respectively. What is the minimum normal force he must exert? Assume the walls are vertical and that the static friction forces are both at their maximum, Ffr = µsFN.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsss said:
The 50.0 kg climber is supported in the "chimney" by the friction forces exerted on his shoes and back. The static coefficients of friction between his shoes and the wall, and between his back and the wall, are 0.90 and 0.65, respectively. What is the minimum normal force he must exert? Assume the walls are vertical and that the static friction forces are both at their maximum, Ffr = µsFN.

nice story, what exactly do you want?
 
So I know the net force must equal zero because the climber isn't moving.
I'm assuming the Ff can be determined by multiplying the mass*gravity*friction-coefficient.
But it seems that if Fnet=0, then the minimum Ff should just be equal to the climber's weight. (ie. Fg + Ff(1) + Ff(2) = 0 )

Hopefully I can get some help on this because it can't be that simple.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top