What is the minimum speed limit in the universe?

AI Thread Summary
Particles like photons travel at the speed of light because they do not interact with the Higgs field. Objects with non-zero rest mass can move at any speed less than the speed of light, including being stationary. The concept of an absolute minimum speed limit is not applicable since all objects with mass can have speeds ranging from zero to just below the speed of light. The interaction with the Higgs field does not impose a minimum speed; rather, it defines mass and the resulting speed capabilities. Thus, the minimum speed limit in the universe is effectively zero for massive objects.
Justice Hunter
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
I have a question :x

Technically, particles, like photons, which don't interact with the higgs field travel at the speed of light.

wouldn't the absolute minimum speed limit be something that interacts infinitely with the higgs field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Justice Hunter said:
I have a question :x

Technically, particles, like photons, which don't interact with the higgs field travel at the speed of light.

wouldn't the absolute minimum speed limit be something that interacts infinitely with the higgs field?

No. Particles with no rest mass are constrained to move at the speed of light in all reference frames but objects with non-zero rest mass can move at any speed less than the speed of light, including zero.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz
Justice Hunter said:
wouldn't the absolute minimum speed limit be something that interacts infinitely with the higgs field?
An object does not have to be infinitely massive to be stationary with respect to an inertial frame - it only needs to have non-zero rest mass.
 
All things (other than those moving at c) move at a relative speed, defined by a reference frame. Therefore the speed can be anything from 0 up < c.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top