What Is the Minimum Thickness for Constructive Interference in a Thin Film?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the minimum thickness for constructive interference in a thin film on glass, considering the indices of refraction. The formula for constructive interference is noted as 2t = mL, but it requires adjustments based on the film's refractive index. When the index of the film (x) is less than that of the glass (y), the wavelength in the film must be calculated as L = λ/n, where λ is the wavelength in air. If x is greater than y, the condition changes to 2t = L/2, indicating a different phase shift during reflection. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Joza
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
A thin film is put on the surface of glass, with indexes of refraction of x and y respectively.

If light, with wavelength L in air, is reflected from the 2 sides of the film, to interfere constructively, what is the minimum thickness required.


The question is stated just like that, so I think it is vague in some parts.

I can't think of a formula to work this out. I know for con. interference, 2t=mL, where m is a whole number. But this isn't enough, and doesn't relate the indexes of r.

Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't be doing your Homework 3 and half hours before its due.. tut tut:-p
 
Haha. I'd usually do it on Saturday, but with a boozin session going down, it didnt get done.

Besides, I'm a member here ages, so the guys can be great help when needed.

So did you get this one? Hey I helped you with the polarizer one :approve:
 
Sure i got it......

Nah i think I'm retarded, on 40%..

Still can't get the polarizer one or this one or the last one lol
 
Ah...there would have been a nice a pav pint in it for ya.

Hey, what's your name? Don't tell me your TP...:rolleyes:
 
Im taking a break, think "Fringes from Different Interfering Wavelengths" may be answerable! If i hit 60 i'll be proud! lol ;)
 
I don't think I'll hit 60 this time...


Damn weekends...;)
 
Joza said:
I can't think of a formula to work this out. I know for con. interference, 2t=mL, where m is a whole number. But this isn't enough, and doesn't relate the indexes of r.
Assuming x < y, the phase change on reflection is the same for both reflections so all that matters is the phase difference due to traveling through the film. That equation (2t = mL) will work, but L must be the wavelength in the film. That's where the index of refraction comes in.

If x > y, things will be a bit different. Learn more here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/thinfilm.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, x > y.

I understand it when x < y.

Then 2t=L, where L is wavelength in the film. So L would be index of refraction in film times wavelength in air.

But x > y...
 
  • #10
Joza said:
Yes, x > y.

I understand it when x < y.

Then 2t=L, where L is wavelength in the film. So L would be index of refraction in film times wavelength in air.
Not exactly. Is the wavelength shorter or longer in the film?

But x > y...
In that case the second reflection undergoes a different phase shift than the first (actually no phase shift). See that link for details.
 
  • #11
Sorry, divided by...

So does that mean 2t=L?? Or t=L?
 
  • #12
Joza said:
So does that mean 2t=L?? Or t=L?
When x > y, the condition for constructive interference (and minimum thickness) is 2t = L/2 (where L = wavelength in the film).
 
Back
Top