What is the Missing Component in the Equation of Motion for the Asimov Pendulum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the analysis of the Asimov pendulum's motion using spherical coordinates. The acceleration and force components are outlined, leading to the derived equation of motion for the theta component. However, the contributor questions the omission of the radial and phi components in standard texts, noting that neither of these terms equals zero. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the complete equation of motion. The contributor seeks a solution without resorting to Lagrangian methods.
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I am reading about the Asimov pendulum (see figure)

The aceleration in spherical coordinates is

##\vec{a} =( R \dot{\theta}^2 - R \omega^2 \sin ^2 \theta) \hat{r} + (R \ddot{\theta} - R \omega ^2 \sin \theta \cos \theta ) \hat{\theta} + (2R \dot{\theta} \omega \cos \theta) \hat{\phi}##

The forze is:

##-mg\hat{y}= -mg\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta) \hat{\theta} =-mg\sin(\theta) \hat{\theta}##

If i analize the theta component i find the answer for the equation of motion

##R \ddot{\theta} - R \omega ^2 \sin \theta \cos \theta = -g\sin(\theta)##

But, what happen with the other component of equation of motion?, why this does not appear in the books?

##R \dot{\theta}^2 - R \omega^2 \sin ^2 \theta =0##
##2R \dot{\theta} \omega \cos \theta=0##
In the last equation neither of the terms are zero.

Pd: I does not want to use the Lagran
 

Attachments

  • 111.jpg
    111.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 448
Physics news on Phys.org
Try solving the equation and find out.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
76
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Back
Top