What is the mistake in my calculation for gravitational field strength?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a calculation error in determining gravitational field strength using the formula g = GM / r^2. The user attempts to relate mass and density, leading to the equation p * 4/3 * pi * r = g. They note that the density of one object is half that of another, while its radius is twice as large, but their final calculation yields an incorrect gravitational field strength of 56.13 Nkg^-1 instead of the expected 13.4 Nkg^-1. The user is seeking assistance in identifying the mistake in their reasoning or calculations. Clarifying the relationships between mass, density, and radius is crucial for accurate results.
pyman999
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


70d030c2091bcb8514dcab3cf06abd76.png

Homework Equations


g = GM / r^2, where g is the gravitational field strength, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the attracting body, r is the radius of the attracting body.
p = M / v, where p is density and v is the volume.
Vs = 4/3 * pi * r^3, where Vs is the volume of a sphere, r is the radius of the sphere.

The Attempt at a Solution


g = M / r^2 (as G is constant)
rearraging p = M / v, M = pv
pv / r^2 = g
(p * 4/3 * pi * r^3) / r^2 = g (assuming the planet is perfectly spherical)
p * 4/3 * pi * r = g
density of Q is 1/2 that of P, radius is 2x that of P.
1/2 * 4/3 * pi * 2 = 4/3 * pi
therefore, 4/3 * pi * 13.4 = 56.13Nkg^-1, however the answer is 13.4Nkg^-1? Can someone see where I've gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
4/3 is a constant, and so is pi... just like G.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top