What is the Moment of Inertia for a Non-Uniform Cane with Attached Device?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a non-uniform cane, specifically a folding White Cane used by the blind. The user has determined the center of mass and the axis of rotation but seeks assistance in calculating the moment of inertia, especially when an additional device is attached. They mention that swinging the cane like a pendulum could help find the frequency of oscillation, which can then be used to calculate the inertia. Confusion arises regarding the relationship between the radius of gyration and the distance from the pivot to the center of mass. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying basic physics principles to real-world objects with non-uniform density.
UKDv12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a cane with non-uniform density and I'm trying to find its moment of inertia. There is no equation for its mass/density vs. length. If you need to picture it, it's a folding White Cane used by the blind. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000VB0CG0/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I found the center of mass in a crude way by just trying to balance it. The axis of rotation should be about 12 cm down from the handle, or 126.5 cm from the bottom, since this is where it is often held. I was wondering if anyone could help me find its moment of inertia at this axis.

Cane Length: 138.5 cm
Center of Mass: 63.5 cm from the handle, 75 cm from the bottom
Cane Weight: 255.15 grams

I am also trying to find the moment of inertia when a device weighing 230 grams is attached 30 cm from the top of the cane. The center of mass of the entire apparatus when the device is added is 50 cm from the handle of the cane and 88.5 from the bottom.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That information is not sufficient in determining the inertia. What you can do is swing it like a pendulum and find the frequency of oscillation, then you can calculate the inertia.
 
Sorry, I don't quite follow. I'm confused on how I calculate moment of inertia from frequency.
 
I've taken a look at that, but I don't understand why the radius of gyration is different from the distance from the pivot to the center of mass.
 
Because points farther away from the rotation pivot move faster. Now you're getting into low level physics, i.e. asking why we define inertia of a particle as mr^2 etc.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top