Discrete What Is the Most Rigorous Combinatorics Book Available?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the search for a rigorous combinatorics book that provides formal definitions and proofs grounded in set theory, particularly regarding counting principles and permutations. The original poster expresses frustration with existing texts that lack thorough explanations and rely on informal reasoning, such as the pigeonhole principle. In response, a recommendation is made for two set theory books: Kunnen's Set Theory and Jech's Set Theory, suggesting that these may better meet the need for rigorous mathematical foundations in combinatorics.
SrVishi
Messages
75
Reaction score
15
Hi, I am trying to find a completely rigorous book on combinatorics. For example, one that states the sum and product counting principles in terms of set theory and proves them, treats permutations as a bijection from a set onto itself, etc. Many don't even explain the reasoning behind those principles, taking them as mere informal facts, so rigorous set theoretic definitions and proofs could at least help my intuition. It seems that even those that try to be rigorous don't live up to it. For example, some don't prove the pigeonhole principle, or do it with informal reasoning in terms of bins/balls. Other times, the attempts at "proofs" are just plain "handwavy." Could someone recommend me a good book? Thanks in advance for any response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A combinatorics book isn't what you want, you want a set theory book.
 
SrVishi said:
Hi, I am trying to find a completely rigorous book on combinatorics. For example, one that states the sum and product counting principles in terms of set theory and proves them, treats permutations as a bijection from a set onto itself, etc. Many don't even explain the reasoning behind those principles, taking them as mere informal facts, so rigorous set theoretic definitions and proofs could at least help my intuition. It seems that even those that try to be rigorous don't live up to it. For example, some don't prove the pigeonhole principle, or do it with informal reasoning in terms of bins/balls. Other times, the attempts at "proofs" are just plain "handwavy." Could someone recommend me a good book? Thanks in advance for any response.

Try either Kunnen's Set Theory or Jech's Set Theory.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top