What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around the latest installment of the "Random Thoughts" thread on Physics Forums, highlighting various topics including critiques of documentary programming on the History Channel and National Geographic's recent ownership change. Participants express concerns about the quality of content in documentaries and share personal anecdotes, such as a humorous incident involving a clogged kitchen extractor fan. The conversation also touches on mathematical discussions regarding prime numbers and cultural observations about societal norms and language use.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with documentary programming and its impact on public knowledge.
  • Basic understanding of prime numbers and mathematical proofs.
  • Awareness of cultural commentary and societal norms.
  • Knowledge of language variations and their implications in communication.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the impact of media ownership on documentary content quality.
  • Research advanced mathematical concepts related to prime numbers.
  • Investigate cultural differences in language use and societal expectations.
  • Learn about the effects of solar irradiation in different geographical locations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for media analysts, educators in mathematics, cultural commentators, and anyone interested in the intersection of media, society, and education.

  • #6,961
I'm getting paranoid about someone reading all my notifications; bottom of my notifications always says " Mark read". Is that Mark44 reading them all?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #6,962
WWGD said:
I'm getting paranoid about someone reading all my notifications; bottom of my notifications always says " Mark read". Is that Mark44 reading them all?
Principally, yes. However, it is not Mark but Mach. Also not 44, but 2. Furthermore, there was a typo and it had to be ready, not read. Moreover, it's not the notifications, rather than the projected speed at which they are planned to be deleted.
 
  • #6,963
fresh_42 said:
Principally, yes. However, it is not Mark but Mach. Also not 44, but 2. Furthermore, there was a typo and it had to be ready, not read. Moreover, it's not the notifications, rather than the projected speed at which they are planned to be deleted.
Mark McMach? Or Marky Mark?
 
  • #6,964
fresh_42 said:
Principally, yes. However, it is not Mark but Mach. Also not 44, but 2. Furthermore, there was a typo and it had to be ready, not read. Moreover, it's not the notifications, rather than the projected speed at which they are planned to be deleted.
I always wondered if people who had theorems or other names would refer to them. Would Cauchy refer to " We conclude by my Theorem"? Would Mach say he flew at " Me 2"( Mach 2)?
 
  • #6,965
WWGD said:
I always wondered if people who had theorems or other names would refer to them. Would Cauchy refer to " We conclude by my Theorem"? Would Mach say he flew at " Me 2"( Mach 2)?
Rindler referred to a space using Rindler coordinates as "the uniformly accelerated lattice" or "rocket coordinates", although he did acknowledge that the space "is occasionally referred to as Rindler space".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #6,966
DrGreg said:
Rindler referred to a space using Rindler coordinates as "the uniformly accelerated lattice" or "rocket coordinates", although he did acknowledge that the space "is occasionally referred to as Rindler space".
I would have preferred if he had used " Me Space". Please tell him if you run into him.
 
  • #6,967
DrGreg said:
Rindler referred to a space using Rindler coordinates as "the uniformly accelerated lattice" or "rocket coordinates", although he did acknowledge that the space "is occasionally referred to as Rindler space".
A friend claimed that this was the best way to get something named after you - discover something and give it a clumsy name. Other people will start using your name as a shorthand...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and BillTre
  • #6,968
DrGreg said:
Rindler referred to a space using Rindler coordinates as "the uniformly accelerated lattice" or "rocket coordinates", although he did acknowledge that the space "is occasionally referred to as Rindler space".

WWGD said:
Please tell him if you run into him.

Do not promise this! Nobody really knows how liability cases are dealt with in the other realm!
 
  • #6,969
fresh_42 said:
Do not promise this! Nobody really knows how liability cases are dealt with in the other realm!
I'm not planning to travel there in the foreseeable future.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #6,970
WWGD said:
I always wondered if people who had theorems or other names would refer to them.
Feynman said:
This is called "the diagram of the process".
 
  • #6,971
WWGD said:
I always wondered if people who had theorems or other names would refer to them.
I was slightly embarrassed not to know the Kato-Rellich Theorem, because I learned from Kato's book, where it is Theorem 4.3, with a footnote: "Theorems 4.3 and 4.4 are due to RELLICH [3]. See also T. KATO [3], [4]".

Same with a few other theorems of his.
 
  • #6,972
Keith_McClary said:
Feynman said:
Kind of matches the line of this song , can't remember the name " It's all part...of the process.." I would hear at St Arbucks ( auto incorrect).
 
  • #6,973
Keith_McClary said:
I was slightly embarrassed not to know the Kato-Rellich Theorem, because I learned from Kato's book, where it is Theorem 4.3, with a footnote: "Theorems 4.3 and 4.4 are due to RELLICH [3]. See also T. KATO [3], [4]".

Same with a few other theorems of his.
Well, you're way ahead of me by that account. I was not even aware of the author himself.

I do remember, though, this sort of funny anecdote ( at least for me). I have only cursory knowledge about literature. Once I was talking with this literature professor and the line " It was the best of times, it was the worse of times". It was one of the 3 things I remembered , that it was from " A tale of two cities". The prof misidentified it, yet I got it right. It was awkward ; any other exchange would have shown him to be greatly more knowledgeable than I in this area.
 
  • #6,974
Today is my mom's birthday and during celebrating my sister made our video and after watching It I realized how old I have became😭.
In my mind I was just a small boy.
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary
  • #6,975
The trip - dubbed The Atlantic Dash - was a 3,200 mile journey from the Canary Islands to Antigua.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #6,976
Astronuc said:
The trip - dubbed The Atlantic Dash - was a 3,200 mile journey from the Canary Islands to Antigua.

Your trip? Is that you sailing?
 
  • #6,977
WWGD said:
Your trip? Is that you sailing?
NO, not me. Just an interesting trip.
 
  • #6,978
Read somewhere:
" Wikipedia is a real suppository of information". Yikes, I prefer reading it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BigDon and BillTre
  • #6,979
Can't help a smirk , in other sites, when posts of someone calling others idiots contain several misspelled words. Dude, when you call others idiots, use the spellcheck first. And what is it with these Czecs and spelling?
 
  • #6,980
I think they're Russian to reply so they don't do a spell Czech to Polish their post before they Finnish.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, WWGD and BillTre
  • #6,981
Ibix said:
I think they're Russian to reply so they don't do a spell Czech to Polish their post before they Finnish.
And they may be too Hungary to do so.

It reminds me of when Putin's child was trying their clothes at the store , he was a little Russian dressing on the side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #6,982
Happy Mother's Day

Screen Shot 2021-05-08 at 5.51.31 PM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BigDon and WWGD
  • #6,983
6a00d8357f3f2969e201bb0801ae39970d.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, nuuskur, WWGD and 1 other person
  • #6,984
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, nuuskur and WWGD
  • #6,985
does anyone know if you can go to sleep with your phone under your pillow? was going to start waking up a little earlier but don't want to start irritating everyone with that obnoxious radar sound. :nb) it's not going to, like, overheat and catch on fire or anything?
 
  • #6,986
etotheipi said:
does anyone know if you can go to sleep with your phone under your pillow? was going to start waking up a little earlier but don't want to start irritating everyone with that obnoxious radar sound. :nb) it's not going to, like, overheat and catch on fire or anything?
I wouldn't do it. Besides the small chance it catches fire, I like to limit prolonged close proximity exposure of my phone to my head, just in case.

https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/15/d...your-body-california-health-department-warns/
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #6,987
etotheipi said:
does anyone know if you can go to sleep with your phone under your pillow? was going to start waking up a little earlier but don't want to start irritating everyone with that obnoxious radar sound. :nb) it's not going to, like, overheat and catch on fire or anything?
Can you plug headphones to your phone and put it aside?
 
  • #6,988
I would not worry about a fire or explosion.

Why not turn just down the volume.
On the other hand, certainty of waking at the proper time is not nothing. I used to be on-call 24 hours a day for a vision critical job (eyebank) and kept my phone in a large ceramic cup by my bed. The cup provided amplification (I guess through resonance). I wanted to be sure it woke me. It also woke my wife, but she wanted to keep track of me anyway.

Nevertheless, volume control should provide a happy middle path, once calibrated.
The earphones sound OK, if tolerable, but that might be a temporary problem anyway.
I have found that if I want to wake at a certain time, on a regular schedule (and get enough sleep), I will adapt to the new wake time after a few days, and awake then anyway, due to the resetting of my internal alarm clock.
 
  • #6,989
You could switch to an IPhone. The alarm is so traumatizing that you just have to set it and your subconscious will wake you up in advance to disable it; works for me.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, Keith_McClary, hmmm27 and 2 others
  • #6,990
Or you can ask two people ( just in case) to call you at that time.

When writing this I remembered of someone called just that: Justin Case. Don't know if the parents were careless or just missed it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2K ·
66
Replies
2K
Views
62K
  • · Replies 3K ·
89
Replies
3K
Views
163K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K