What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses various random thoughts and observations, touching on topics such as media programming, personal anecdotes, language use, and mathematical curiosities. The scope includes informal commentary, humor, and reflections on everyday experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration with the quality of documentaries on channels like the History Channel and National Geographic, suggesting a decline in factual programming.
  • There is a humorous anecdote about discovering a polythene bag obstructing a kitchen extractor fan, leading to a discussion about the clarity of installation manuals.
  • Participants share thoughts on the nature of prime numbers, particularly regarding the status of the number 2 and its implications for mathematical proofs.
  • There are reflections on language use and the reactions to grammatical errors made by native speakers, with some participants sharing their personal responses to such situations.
  • One participant humorously suggests that if 2 were not considered prime, it would complicate the understanding of prime factors in even numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views, particularly regarding the status of the number 2 as a prime and the quality of media programming. No consensus is reached on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying degrees of skepticism and humor, with some comments reflecting personal experiences and subjective opinions rather than objective analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in informal discussions about media, language, and mathematics may find this thread engaging.

  • #7,981
WWGD said:
Rita? Is that a reference to Mambo #5? How about Sandra and the others? I am apparently one of the 5 people who liked the song.
It is one of my favorites. And then I met a beautiful young lady who also loved the song. She used to watch the video all the time growing up. I fell in love in about five seconds. LOL! And that was OUR song. So romantic eh?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #7,982
WWGD said:
But I don't get how the pic matches the show.
It matches what I love about the role (Fiona) of Gabrielle Anwar (finding solutions the explosive way).
 
  • #7,983
fresh_42 said:
It matches what I love about the role (Fiona) of Gabrielle Anwar (finding solutions the explosive way).
Always hoped Gabrielle had a son or daughter called Peace. Peace Anwar. Then she would read War and Peace.
 
  • #7,984
Ivan Seeking said:
It is one of my favorites. And then I met a beautiful young lady who also loved the song. She used to watch the video all the time growing up. I fell in love in about five seconds. LOL! And that was OUR song. So romantic eh?


That guy, Lou Bega, dropped out of sight after that song.
 
  • #7,985
WWGD said:
That guy, Lou Bega, dropped out of sight after that song.
So did I for about 3 years. :)

It looks like he kept trying but didn't have much success.

This is his latest effort - Scatman & Hatman



It's alright.

But Mambo #5 is legendary.
 
  • #7,986
WWGD said:
That guy, Lou Bega, dropped out of sight after that song.
From Wikipedia:
Born in Munich, married in Vegas, living in Berlin, and professing Christian. ##\searrow##
 
  • #7,987
fresh_42 said:
From Wikipedia:
Born in Munich, married in Vegas, living in Berlin, and professing Christian.
Christian who? Is she as lovely as Rita?
 
  • #7,990
Ivan Seeking said:
Your point?
It is usually a boy's name.
 
  • #7,991
Keith_McClary said:
It is usually a boy's name.
I've meet atheists called Christian. They're kind of boxed in at birth.
 
  • #7,992
Keith_McClary said:
It is usually a boy's name.
Christian and Christian may take issue with that

1630879798156.png


1630879749538.png
 
  • #7,993
I spent 30 minutes damning Excel until I realized it only generates random integers. At least Rand and Randbetween.
 
  • #7,994
WWGD said:
I spent 30 minutes damning Excel until I realized it only generates random integers. At least Rand and Randbetween.
It only came up as 666?
 
  • #7,995
WWGD said:
I've meet atheists called Christian.
Don't even get me started on politics.
 
  • #7,996
Ivan Seeking said:
It only came up as 666?
Incredibly so, given numbers were in the range (1,100).
 
  • #7,997
WWGD said:
Incredibly so, given numbers were in the range (1,100).
It is an impossible demand anyway. Real random numbers are almost certain transcendental, and no algorithm in this world can list even a single one.
 
  • #7,998
fresh_42 said:
It is an impossible demand anyway. Real random numbers are almost certain transcendental, and no algorithm in this world can list even a single one.
How about using the 3-pendulum problem somehow?
 
  • #7,999
fresh_42 said:
It is an impossible demand anyway. Real random numbers are almost certain transcendental, and no algorithm in this world can list even a single one.

WWGD said:
How about using the 3-pendulum problem somehow?
By definition it will always calculate the same answers for each iteration.

You can do things like using a photon detector to produce random numbers.
 
  • #8,000
Thanks. Just wanted here to have the 8,000th/nd post.
 
  • #8,001
WWGD said:
Thanks. Just wanted here to have the 8,000th/nd post.
:kiss:
 
  • #8,002
Danke schon
 
  • #8,003
WWGD said:
Danke schon
The first move was within the rules. I deleted my own comment within the time window.

Now I abused my mentor power to restore the original posts. :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #8,004
Do you have a wave count in the US? I wonder whether it is the same as here. This would indicate a correlation of stupidity.
 
  • #8,005
fresh_42 said:
The first move was within the rules. I deleted my own comment within the time window.

Now I abused my mentor power to restore the original posts. :cool:
I think there is a liberal conspiracy at work.
 
  • #8,006
fresh_42 said:
Do you have a wave count in the US? I wonder whether it is the same as here. This would indicate a correlation of stupidity.

Mainly in red states. Note for example below, US, Florida, California [twice the population of Florida]
1630887734108.png


1630887854819.png

1630887898155.png
 
  • #8,007
I think normal people would say it is wave #4.
However, I think of the second wave as a continuation of the first wave. It just took a while for the first wave of infection to spread to more rural, regions.
 
  • #8,008
BillTre said:
I think normal people would say it is wave #4.
However, I think of the second wave as a continuation of the first wave. It just took a while for the first wave of infection to spread to more rural, regions.
Hmm, same here. I thought it was correlated, although I do not have an explanation. Is it due to the underlying SIR model, or due to the same negligence in dealing with the situation? Probably both.
 
  • #8,009
If your last name is Knapp, don't call your daughter Ivanna.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein
  • #8,010
WWGD said:
If your last name is Knapp, don't call your daughter Ivanna.
Long ago I worked with a man whose parents had immigrated to the US from China. They came here when Harry Truman was President, to whom they were very grateful. So Mr and Mrs Dong decided to name their first son Harry, in honor of Truman. True story.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K