What is the Operator for Absolute Value of Momentum in Quantum Mechanics?

csopi
Messages
81
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I am looking for the operator representing the absolute value of a particle's momentum. In other words: the square root of the laplacian (preferably in 3 dimensions, but 2 would also be fine).

I am aware, that integral formulas exist for this operator, but is it possible to express it in terms of first order differential operators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How should the solution look like?

Something like an a-representation

\sqrt{\hat{p}^2_a} \, \psi(a) = c\partial_a\,\psi(a)

with

\psi(a) = \langle a|\psi\rangle

(a is neither the x- nor the p-rep. for which we know the expressions; so you are looking for a new a-basis)
 
Interesting.But this a-basic representation is seldom used.Isn't it.
 
One remark: |p| is a postive operator, whereas a differential operator isn't positive i.e. has negative eigenvalues, therefore the above mentioned idea will not work.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top