What is the Optimal Delta for a Given Epsilon and Limit?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the optimal delta for a given epsilon in the context of limits, specifically evaluating the limit of a rational function as x approaches 0. The original poster presents a limit problem and seeks to determine the greatest delta that satisfies the epsilon condition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between delta and epsilon, questioning why the smaller delta is preferred when both values are derived. There is also discussion on the implications of negative values in the context of absolute values in inequalities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the reasoning behind choosing the smaller delta and discussing the implications of the absolute value in the inequality. Some guidance has been provided regarding the necessity of positive delta values, but no consensus has been reached on the optimal approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of conflicting values obtained from a book, which raises questions about the accuracy of the calculations and the definitions being applied. The discussion also reflects on the constraints of the problem, particularly the requirement for delta to be positive.

ƒ(x)
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
Given the limit of [tex]\frac{x^2+2x}{x^2-3x}[/tex] as x approaches 0 equals [tex]\frac{-2}{3}[/tex] and that ε = .01, find the greatest c such that every δ between zero and c is good. Give an exact answer.


0 < |x-0| < δ
0 < |[tex]\frac{x^2+2x}{|x^2-3x}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{2}{3|}[/tex]| < ε


|[tex]\frac{x(x+2)}{|x(x-3)}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{2}{3|}[/tex]| = .01
|[tex]\frac{x+2}{|x-3|}[/tex]| = [tex]\frac{-197}{300}[/tex]
300(x+2) = -197(x-3)
300x + 600 = -197x + 591
497x = -9
x = [tex]\frac{-9}{497}[/tex]

But, my book got [tex]\frac{9}{503}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ƒ(x) said:
x = [tex]\frac{-9}{497}[/tex]

But, my book got [tex]\frac{9}{503}[/tex]

Hi ƒ(x)! :smile:

The ε has to be valid on both sides of -2/3 (and positive) …

that gives you 9/497 and 9/503, and 9/503 is smaller. :wink:
 
Ok, but why do I pick the smaller one? If the larger delta works then every delta smaller than that will also work, right?

Also, does it matter if its negative since there is an absolute value sign in the inequality?
 
Hi ƒ(x)! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
ƒ(x) said:
Ok, but why do I pick the smaller one? If the larger delta works then every delta smaller than that will also work, right?

Because if it works for -δ1 < x < δ2, and δ1 > δ > δ2,

then it does not work for x = -δ, does it? :wink:
Also, does it matter if its negative since there is an absolute value sign in the inequality?

The definition says |x| < δ, so δ must be positive.
 
Ok, it's beginning to click. Could you give me a walk through of how you would do this problem?
 
ƒ(x) said:
Ok, it's beginning to click. Could you give me a walk through of how you would do this problem?

I'd solve (x+2)/(x-3) = -2/3 ± 0.01 (isn't that what you did?), and take the smaller of those two |x|s.
 
Ok. Can you explain again why you take the smaller of the two values?
 
You've found f(-δ1) = f(δ2) = ± ε.

Now you need a δ such that if |x| < δ, then |f(x)| < ε.

If δ1 > δ2, and if we choose δ = δ1, then the statement "if |x| < δ1, then |f(x)| < ε" isn't true, because although f(-δ1) = ε, f(δ1) > ε. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K