What is the Orthogonal Property of Vectors in Span?

AI Thread Summary
If vector w is orthogonal to vectors u and v, it follows that w is also orthogonal to the span of u and v. This is demonstrated by expressing any vector in the span as a linear combination, au + bv, where a and b are scalars. The dot product w · (au + bv) can be expanded using distributivity, resulting in w · au + w · bv. Since w is orthogonal to both u and v, both terms equal zero, confirming that w is orthogonal to the entire span. Thus, the orthogonality of w to u and v guarantees its orthogonality to span(u, v).
war485
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If w is orthogonal to u and v, then show that w is also orthogonal to span ( u , v )

Homework Equations



two orthogonal vectors have a dot product equalling zero

The Attempt at a Solution



I can see this geometrically in my mind, and I know that w . u = 0 and w . v = 0
but I don't know or understand how I can show this for its span in writing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a vector in span(u,v) is of the form au+bv. So w . (au+bv) = 0, using the distributivity of the dot product.
 
you said that span(u,v) is in this form au+bv

so
w . (au+bv) = 0
w . au + w . bv = 0

where a and b are any scalar numbers
and that's all? There's no more to it?

[edit]
thanks grief. That one little bit helped a lot!
 
Last edited:
war485 said:
you said that span(u,v) is in this form au+bv
No, Grief said a vector in the subspace span(u,v) is of the form au+bv for scalars a and b. To say that a vector is orthogonal to a subspace means that the vector is orthogonal to each vector in that subspace.

war485 said:
so
w . (au+bv) = 0
w . au + w . bv = 0

where a and b are any scalar numbers
and that's all? There's no more to it?
You need to show that given a vector x in span(u,v), we have w.x=0 . From above, x is of the form au+bv, so you want to show that w.(au+bv)=0. This means beginning with w.(au+bv) and showing it equals 0. As Grief already said, to do so just requires distributivity and recognising that w being orthogonal to u and to v means that w.u=0 and w.v=0.
 
To make sure I got this right one more time:
a vector in span(u,v) is in this form au+bv

making (au+bv) dot w = 0 shows it is orthogonal, meaning any vector in that span(u,v) is orthogonal to w
then it'll become w . au + w . bv = 0
then w . au = a(w.u) = 0 since w.u = 0 (orthogonal)
w . bv = 0 since w . v = 0 (orthogonal)
so then 0 = 0

right?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top