What Is the Output of F = A + B.C in Boolean Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackson6612
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Boolean function F = A + B.C, where A, B, and C are variables. The initial confusion stems from the interpretation of the function and the relationship between its terms. It is clarified that in Boolean algebra, the operations of union and intersection correspond to logical OR and AND, respectively. The mention of missing variables in the term A is addressed by explaining that A can be expressed with B and its complement without altering the function's value. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the equivalence of set theory and Boolean algebra in the context of logic gates.
jackson6612
Messages
334
Reaction score
1
I'm new to this math world, so please explain your reply in as much detail as possible. Thank you.

Please have a look on this link (Example 6.4):
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3667/img0023hg.jpg

Boolean function is F=A+\overset{\_\_}{B}.C. I don't understand even the first step. I don't understand what it means by saying that the function has three variables A, B, and C. The first term A is missing two variables (B and C).

Please help me. Thank you for your time.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The first step is simply saying any set (A) can br expressed as the intersection of itself and the whole space. Furthermore the union of any set (B) and its complement (B') = the whole space. Putting this together and you get A=A.(B + B')=A.B + A.B'

. means intersection, + means union.
 
Thank you, Mathman.

But these things 'intersection' and 'uniion' are studied under topics of sets. That Boolean function is part of Boolean algebra involving logic gates. So, could you please deal it that way? Further, I don't even get what the question is asking. Could you please shine a light on this too? Thank you very much for all the guidance and your time.
 
The algebra of "logic gates" and the algebra of sets are essentially identical. I happen to be used to sets, so I express it that way. union is equivalent to "or", intersection is equivalent to "and" and complement is equivalent to "not".

As for
The first term A is missing two variables (B and C).
, all the author is saying you can always throw in [B or (not B)] without changing anything.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top