What Is the Period of a Thin Rod Swinging as a Compound Pendulum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the period of a thin rod acting as a compound pendulum, pivoted at one end and swinging in the xy plane. The key equations involved include the torque equation, defined as Torque = I * α, and the angular frequency ω, derived from the small angle approximation. The participants clarify that the moment of inertia for the rod can be expressed as I = (1/3) * m * R^2, but for this problem, it is essential to relate angular frequency to the gravitational force and the distance from the pivot. The final equation for the period is established as T = 2π√(I/mga).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compound pendulum dynamics
  • Familiarity with torque and angular momentum concepts
  • Knowledge of small angle approximation in oscillatory motion
  • Basic principles of rotational motion and moment of inertia
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the period for different types of pendulums, including simple and compound pendulums
  • Learn about the application of the small angle approximation in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the relationship between torque, angular momentum, and moment of inertia in rotational dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass distribution on the moment of inertia for non-uniform rods
USEFUL FOR

Students of classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in the dynamics of pendulums and rotational motion analysis.

roeb
Messages
98
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A thin rod (of width zero, but not necessarily uniform) is pivoted freely at one end about the horizontal z axis, being free to swing in the xy plane (x horizontal, y vertically down). Its mass is m, its CM (center of mass) is a distance a from the pivot, and its moment of inertia (about the z axis) is I. Write down the equation of motion d/dt(Lz) = Torque_z and assuming the motion is confined to small angles, find the period of this compound pendulum.

Homework Equations



T = 2pi/w
Lz = mvr
Torque = r cross F = I*(angular accel)


The Attempt at a Solution



Hmm, I think I am close to getting the right answer, but just can't quite get it.
I know Torque = I*alpha = I*a*d^2/dt^2(phi)
I also know that Lz = m*(a*d/dt(phi))*a = m*a^2*d/dt(phi)
Taking the deriv. of Lz seems to yield an equation where the phi's cancel out.
I also know that I = 1/3*MR^2 for a rod, but in this problem, I don't think that I need to use it.

Hmm, I need to somehow work gravity into the equation... but I can't quite figure out how.

Does anyone have any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi roeb,
similar to any classical mechanic problem, you probably want to draw a force diagram, things will be clearer from this point.
Using torque as I\alpha is going to be a bit obscure.
If I am you, I'll use its definition. What is torque by definition?
After you figure out what torque is, then you'll figure out that it is related to gravitational force (yes, it comes in here).
After you find out the torque, try to write out the whole equation, torque = d(L)/dt.
And remember to use small angle approximation.
After doing some algebra, you'll probably see something very familiar to you, or if not, something like a periodic oscillation equation with respect to theta.
Then it shouldn't be hard from there.

Good luck
 
Thanks for your reply.

r = (asin(phi), acos(phi))
F = (0, mg, 0)

Torque = r cross F
Torque_z = m*g*a*sin(phi)

momentum = m(acos(phi) d/dt(phi), -asin(phi) d/dt(phi)
L = r cross momentum
Lz = -m*a^2*d/dt(phi)

Using the small angle approximation I get, the simple harmonic oscillator equation:

ma^2*d^2/dt^2(phi) + mga*phi = 0

so omega^2 = mga/ma^2.

I think everything up to this point is correct. My point problem now is that according to my book omega^2 (which is the angular frequency) is mga/I.
--> Can I say that I = ma^2? I'm not sure if that is correct to say?
 
Almost, but not quite. I think the problem is at your momentum.
It might be easier to look it from the other way around
L = I*d(theta)/dt
Now you can see that you yourself assume that I = ma^2
Otherwise, I don't see anything incorrect
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K