What Is the Position Operator if Momentum Is Given by a Specific Operator?

kemiisto
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the operator for position x if the operator for momentum p is taken to be \left(\hbar/2m\right)^{1/2}\left(A + B\right), with \left[A,B\right] = 1 and all other commutators zero.

Homework Equations


Canonical commutation relation
\left [ \hat{ x }, \hat{ p } \right ] = \hat{x} \hat{p} - \hat{p} \hat{x} = i \hbar

The Attempt at a Solution


Using c = \left(\hbar/2m\right)^{1/2}
\hat{x} \hat{p} f - \hat{p} \hat{x} f = i \hbar
\hat{x} c \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) f - c \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) \hat{x} f = i \hbar
c \hat{x} \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) f - c \left(\hat{A} + \hat{B}\right) \hat{x} f = i \hbar
\hat{x} \hat{A} f + \hat{x} \hat{B} f - \hat{A} \hat{x} f - \hat{B} \hat{x} f = i \hbar / c
\hat{x} \hat{A} f - c \hat{A} \hat{x} f + \hat{x} \hat{B} f - \hat{B} \hat{x} f = i \hbar / c
\left [ \hat{x}, \hat{A} \right ] + \left [ \hat{x}, \hat{B} \right ] = i \hbar / c
"all other commutators zero"
0 + 0 = i \hbar / c

:confused:

Problem 1.2 from http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199274987/" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If [A,B]=1, then what will be the commutator of A with A+B? Can you go from there?

P.S. Your "f" on the left hand side is unnecessary.
 
If [A, B] = 1 then [A, A + B] = 1

[A, A + B] = A(A + B) - (A + B)A = AA + AB - AA - BA = AB - BA = [A, B] = 1

We have p = c(A + B) and [x, p] = iħ.

xp - px = iħ
cx(A + B) - c(A + B)x = iħ
x(A + B) - (A + B)x = iħ/c | multiply on A from the left
Ax(A + B) - A(A + B)x = iħ/c A | A(A + B) = 1 + (A + B)A
Ax(A + B) - (1 + (A + B)A)x = iħ/c A
Ax(A + B) - x - (A + B)Ax = iħ/c A
[Ax, A + B] - x = iħ/c A
x = -iħ/c A

Checking: [x, p] = xp - px = (-iħ/c A)(c(A + B)) - (c(A + B))(-iħ/c A) = -iħ A(A + B) + iħ (A + B) A = -ih

Ouch! Like always accurate within a sign... :cry:

Anyway, arkajad, many thanks for guiding me. I didn't have enough sleep last night. Maybe tomorrow I'll find the missing sign...
 
Last edited:
Get a sleep and you will have it. But, perhaps, first prove for yourself a very useful identity: for any number a, and any operators A,B,C we have that

[A,B+C]=[A,B]+[A,C]
[A+B,C]=[A,C]+[B,C]
[aA,B]=a[A,B]
[A,aB]=a[A,B]

To save some work use [A,B]=-[B,A] as many times as useful. Once you are done - remember these rules, as they will be handy in the future.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top