What Is the Power Ratio in Gaussian Beams Through a Circular Aperture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thewall12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular Power
thewall12
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the ratio of the power contained within a circle of radius of w0 (in the transverse plane at z = 0) to the total power in the Gaussian beams of orders (0,0), (1,0), (0,1) and (1,1). Then compare the ratio of the power contained within a circle of radius w0/3 to the total power for the (0,0) and (1,1) Gaussian beams. (This transmission difference is the principle behind spatial filtering that is used to select the principal mode from a multimode beam.) You may find it easier to use cylindrical coordinates for this problem.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've attached the solutions. The solutions are for #4. I'm not exactly sure how power and electric field are proportional. Can anybody explain that? Also, I don't understand how the integrals for TEM 01/10 and TEM11 were formulated.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the formula for the intensity distribution of a gaussian beam? (remind yourself of it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_beam)

Notice (also confirmed on that page) that intensity is proportional to power and you should be able to convince yourself that the relationship quoted in the solutions is indeed correct.

It may be helpful to post your own attempts at formulating the integrals you mentioned, so people can help you understand them.
 
Thanks, L-x. I can see the relationship now. I'm still a little lost on the integrals, though. I know that since the beam's optical axis is z, the cylindrical coordinates (r, theta, z) just become a function of r and theta. I understand the bounds on the integrals and the E^2 portion, but not how you have r, r^3, and r^5.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top