What is the pre‐exponential coefficient for this reaction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the pre-exponential coefficient and reaction rates at various temperatures for a reaction with an activation energy of 1.50 eV. The user is uncertain about using the correct constant and whether their calculated values are realistic. They attempted to use the Boltzmann constant for R and provided calculated rates for temperatures ranging from 20°C to 100°C. The pre-exponential constant was found to be 1.534 E27 units per time, with subsequent rates increasing significantly at higher temperatures. The user seeks validation of their calculations and understanding of working with electron volts.
NoOne0507
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two problems with this:
1) I am not sure if I am using the right constant.
2) I have no idea if my values are realistic.

The actual question:

The rate of a reaction is 25.00 units per time at 20.00°C.
The activation energy barrier for this reaction is 1.50 eV.
a) What is the pre‐exponential coefficient for this reaction?
b) What is the rate of reaction at 40.00 °C?
c) What is the rate of reaction at 60.00 °C?
d) What is the rate of reaction at 80.00 °C?
e) What is the rate of reaction at 100.00 °C?

Homework Equations


Boltzmann’s constant k = 8.6173 E ‐5 eV/K

Ra = C*exp[-Q/(RT)]

Ra is rate of reaction
C is constant
Q is activation energy
R is gas constant
T is absolute temperature

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe I should use just the Boltzmann Constant for R. Earlier in the homework assignment we did things in eV/atom, and when I converted R from eV/K*mol to eV/K*atom I ended up with the Boltzmann Constant. But if I am wrong please tell me.

And as for the questions these are the numbers I'm getting, I don't know if they are realistic or not, and the fact most of them are in the vague "units per time" doesn't help alleviate any confusion.

a) The preexponential constant is 1.534 E27 units per time
b) At 313.15 K the reaction rate is 1109 units per time
c) At 333.15 K I get 3.120 E4 units per time
d) At 353.15 K I get 6.016 E5 units per time
e) At 373.15 K I get 8.445 E6 units per time

Are these numbers realistic? I don't have grasp on that at all. It is my first time working in Electron Volts. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Easy to check on the web (or to calculate on your own) - eV is just a 1.602176565(35)×10−19 J. As you are given energy per atom, multiplying it by Avogadro's constant will give you energy per mole.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top