What is the pressure in Kilopascals on a vertical plate

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ian richards
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plate Pressure Vertical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure exerted on a vertical glass plate by wind at a speed of 42 meters per second. Participants explore various theoretical approaches to derive the pressure, considering factors such as air density and the nature of air particle collisions. The context includes both theoretical calculations and practical implications related to high wind speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the formula Pressure = Force/Area, leading to a derivation of force based on momentum change due to elastic collisions of air particles.
  • Another participant challenges the elastic collision assumption, suggesting that the correct approach involves stagnation pressure, which is derived from the kinetic energy of the wind.
  • There is a discussion about the significance of ambient pressure and how it relates to the calculated pressure values.
  • Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of Newtonian fluid dynamics to air, considering factors like viscosity and pressure differences on the plate.
  • One participant provides a numerical approximation for pressure using air density and wind velocity, while noting the need for a Betz limit factor to refine the estimate.
  • Another participant mentions the geographical context of the wind speed, relating it to building codes for hurricane-force winds and potential structural implications for large glass sheets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct method for calculating pressure, with multiple competing views on the assumptions and formulas to use. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about air particle behavior, the applicability of Newtonian fluid dynamics to air, and the need for a limit factor in calculations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of real-world applications of theoretical models.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in fluid dynamics, engineering applications related to wind pressure, and those studying the effects of high wind speeds on structures may find this discussion relevant.

ian richards
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The plate (glass) is 1400 x 700 MM at right angles to the wind. The wind velocity is 42 Metres per second.

The height above the ground is 6 metres.

Your help to an 85yo would be enormously appreciated.

Ian Richards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ian...
I was thinking that :
Pressure=Force /area
If we assume that the air particles collide elastically with the plate then for a small air particle of mass dm the momentum change will be:
$$2 (dm)v $$
Where ##v## is the velocity of air.
We know that force =change in momentum /change in time.
Then we get $$F=2 v (dm/dt) $$
And mass =volume×density=##V×\rho##
And volume here=area of plate × small length traveled by the particle=A×dl
So $$F=2v\rho A (dl/dt) $$
And we can take ##dl/dt=velocity=v##
So $$F=2\rho Av^2 $$
And thus $$P=2\rho v^2$$
[Thats what I think, an assumption can also be taken that the air particle stops after collision ]
 
Interesting derivation, but because of your elastic collision assumption, you ended up at 4x the real world worst case. If the fluid flow stops entirely, all of its kinetic energy will be used to increase the pressure, which results in a pressure increase (compared to ambient) of ##1/2\rho v^2##. This is called the stagnation pressure, and is the worst case scenario.

Out of curiosity, where on Earth are you that has a 42 m/s wind speed?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
cjl said:
Interesting derivation, but because of your elastic collision assumption, you ended up at 4x the real world worst case. If the fluid flow stops entirely, all of its kinetic energy will be used to increase the pressure, which results in a pressure increase (compared to ambient) of ##1/2\rho v^2##. This is called the stagnation pressure, and is the worst case scenario.

I realize what you meant here but I figured I would clarify for everyone else: the stagnation pressure is the pressure that occurs if that entire ##\rho v^2/2## is converted into pressure energy. The ##\rho v^2/2## term itself is commonly referred to as dynamic pressure.

cjl said:
Out of curiosity, where on Earth are you that has a 42 m/s wind speed?

I suppose he never explicitly said Earth... hmm.
 
True enough boneh3ad, and thanks for the clarification. I was ignoring the ambient pressure, but that is a good point to make.
 
42m/s ~= 151km/hr or about 93 mi/hr - hurricane force winds. I know there are geographically based building codes for areas subject to hurricane force winds. Don't know if they are applicable to large glass sheets. I would guess shuttering would be the only solution, if there is one.
 
cjl said:
Interesting derivation, but because of your elastic collision assumption, you ended up at 4x the real world worst case. If the fluid flow stops entirely, all of its kinetic energy will be used to increase the pressure, which results in a pressure increase (compared to ambient) of ##1/2\rho v^2##. This is called the stagnation pressure, and is the worst case scenario.

Out of curiosity, where on Earth are you that has a 42 m/s wind speed?
Sorry... but I didn't understand how will I get the ##1/2## part. If I assume that the particle will collide and stop then it will cause stagnation pressure. Therefore the change in momentum will be ##(dm)v## for the small particle. Which will give a ##1##. How will I get that ##1/2##?
 
jim mcnamara said:
42m/s ~= 151km/hr or about 93 mi/hr - hurricane force winds. I know there are geographically based building codes for areas subject to hurricane force winds. Don't know if they are applicable to large glass sheets. I would guess shuttering would be the only solution, if there is one.
Thank you for your observations.

To CJL - Where am I? I am 6 metres above the level ground at Sydney Australia's Mascot Airport on two separate days with the strongest winds recorded there since 1929 - 152 Kilometres per hr

As I understand it the Pressure in Kilopascals = p (which is ? - the figure and the terminology?) ) x v (velocity in m/s = 42)squared all divided by 2 == ? kps

Can you pse fill in the figures to give a reading for the Pressure in Kilopascals.

Is this figure a maximum? -an average ? - a?

I cannot begin to express my gratitude for your interest and help. Ian Richards.
 
It's ##\rho## the density of air.
 
  • #10
So pressure = 1. 274×(42)2/2=1123. 668 Pascal =0. 112 kpa...
that's the value I am getting... And I ain't sure about it.
 
  • #11
For identical Newtonian fluid the force to the plate must be 0. I think it is wrong to use Newtonian lows for this calculations because air viscosity. For example, there is not only the front superpressure but and the back subpressure. Without calculations, I think that is safe to take as energy density the double amount $$ \Delta{p} = \frac{F}{A} = \rho v_0^2 \Leftrightarrow F=A\rho v_0^2 $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mooncrater
  • #12
How about this approximation --

Air density ρ = 1.225kg/m^3 at ground level on average
Area of window A = 1.4m x .7m = .98m^2
Wind velocity v = 42m/s
We need something like a Betz limit factor,
... but I do not know enough to guess, so how about 1?
This number is usually less than one AFAIK.

So Force in Newtons = (1/2) * 1 * 1 (Betz #) * 1.225 * .98 * (42)^2

F ~= (1.225 * .98 * 1764) / 2 == 1058.8 rounded > 1059 Newtons ( 1 Newton - 1 Pa )
This is not too far from mooncrater's estimate. .11 Kilopascals is my sort-of answer.

Once somebody can provide a limit factor you can get a really decent answer.
Then multiply .11 times the Betz limit (or whatever it is called in Engineering) to get the true value note:
42m/s wind velocity is the upper limit for a Saffir-Simpson 1 - Hurricane (typhoon)

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saffir–Simpson_hurricane_wind_scale
This is the scale for estimating destruction of a storm in the North Atlantic. Scale that applies to Australia is RMSC Tokyo - and would be "Typhoon". Correct?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
16K