What is the Probability of Finding the System in State |1⟩?

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A two-level system is setup so the two eigenvalues are given E_1, E_2, the Hamiltonian is also given as 2x2 matrix (not shown here). The corresponding eigenstates are easy to solved as

<br /> |1\rangle = <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> 1 \\ 0<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right), \qquad<br /> |2\rangle = <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 \\ 1<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right)<br />

1) If we know initially the state of the system is in |2\rangle, what's the probability of finding the system in |1\rangle?

2) If now we introduce an interaction to change the Hamiltonian

<br /> H&#039; =<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right)<br />
so that the total Hamiltonian is H = H0 + H'

At time is ZERO, the initial state is also in |2\rangle, what's probability of finding the system in |1\rangle now?

2. The attempt at a solution
I read some similar examples for solving time-evolution problem but I am quite confuse with the method read in those examples. Here is what I did to solve the problem

For solving problem 1), since we already know the eigenstates and eigenvalues. In addition, the initial state of the system is one eigenstate, so the time-evolution of the system would be

<br /> |\Psi(t)\rangle = \sum_i c_i \exp(-iE_it/\hbar)|i\rangle = \exp(-iE_2t/\hbar)|2\rangle<br />

But since it doesn't contain |1\rangle, hence it is always no chance to find state 1 at time t, that is,

<br /> \left|\langle 1 |\Psi(t)\rangle\right|^2 = 0<br />

For problem 2), we first solve the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the total Hamiltonian and get

<br /> \lambda_1, \quad |\phi_1\rangle ; \qquad \qquad \qquad \lambda_2, \quad |\phi_2\rangle<br />

Now, write |1\rangle and |2\rangle in terms of |\phi_1\rangle and |\phi_1\rangle. Later on, at time t, the state will evolute

<br /> |\Psi(t)\rangle = \sum_i c_i \exp(-i\lambda_i t/\hbar)|\phi_i\rangle<br />

so the probability to find state |1\rangle will be of the same form <br /> \left|\langle 1 |\Psi(t)\rangle\right|^2<br /> but there \langle 1 | and |\Psi(t)\rangle are all written in terms of the new eigenvectors so the probability is not more zero.

Please tell me if my solution have any problem!

But the way, in some book, they solve the similar problem by assuming the time-dependent wave solution is

<br /> |\Psi(t)\rangle = \alpha(t) |1\rangle + \beta(t) |2\rangle<br />

Plug these in time-dependent Schrodinger equation and find the following equations

<br /> i\hbar<br /> \frac{d}{dt}<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> {\alpha} \\ {\beta}<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right)<br /> = <br /> H <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> {\alpha} \\ {\beta}<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right)<br />

By solving the simultaneous equations, they find the time-dependent coefficients, so the time-dependent state could be given directly.

I didn't solve the problem with this method, but I wonder if this method is actually equivalent to mine?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the second method is identical to the first method. Or rather, the first method is derived from the second method. The exponential terms that you put in front of the new eigenstates comes from the differential equation that you wrote on the bottom of your response. Either way will work, but I think the first way is easier to do, but can be tricky remembering the details, whereas the second method is tricky to do but easy to remember where to start.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top