What Is the Probability of Measuring Spin-up for Electron in State Alpha?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_doors
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
the_doors
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
hello guys

Suppose an electron is in the spin state alpha=(a,b). if s_y is measured, what is the probability of result h/2 ?


s_y eigenvector for +h/2 is |y+>=1/sqrt(2) (1,i)) so the probabilty is (<y+|alpha>)^2 . but in the solution i attached , the solution is different ! I'm confused !



thank you for your help
 

Attachments

  • sl.jpg
    sl.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 1,094
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't bother, your solution is correct.
 
so the solution is incorrect ?
 
well there's certainly something wrong when you measure a probability in terms of \hbar2...
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
the_doors said:
so the solution is incorrect ?
Yes, the solution is incorrect. Whoever wrote it made the common mistake of conflating making a measurement with applying the associated operator. In other words, the "solution" calculates ##\langle +_y \lvert \hat{S}_y \rvert \alpha,\beta\rangle## for the probability amplitude while you correctly calculated ##\langle +_y \vert \alpha,\beta\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top