What Is the Probability of Seeing a Point on an Infinite Grid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter h6ss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grid Points
h6ss
Messages
77
Reaction score
9
Here is a difficult probability question I found interesting and thought I'd share:

Suppose you are standing on an infinitely large square grid at the point (0,0), and suppose that you can see infinitely far but cannot see through grid points. Given a random grid point z = (x, y), where x and y are integers, what is the chance you can see z?

The rather elegant answer is:
Prob = \frac{6}{\pi^2}

More information:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no uniform distribution over all integers. What does "random integer" mean?
The answer does not depend much on it, but there are choices that do give a different answer.

I think the problem is not as hard as the pdf describes it, as the steps taken in the first solution are not hard to find and the value of the product is well-known.
 
What is the question actually asking? "What is the probability that the line connecting a randomly assigned point z (x,y) with the origin does not intersect any grid points"?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top