What is the Probability of Winning with Consecutive Spins on a Roulette Wheel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
Ivan91
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So, I have a very easy question.
Imagine a roulette with 38 pockets (0,00,1,2,3,...36)
Suppose you were to place bets on numbers 1,2,3,4.
What is the probability that at least one of your numbers would be the winner in two consecutive spins of the roulette wheel.

I am pretty sure the answer is either 4/38 X 4/38 , or 4/38 X 1/38.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That is the correct answer, but you have to realize the assumptions that are made to get the correct answer.

The main assumption you are using is independence. Also due the the nature of the experiment, you are doing a duplicate of the first trial which means each trial has the same probability.

Simple definition of probability is P(Event) = Number of events in Event / Number of events in total.

Independence implies that for two events A and B, P(A and B) = P(A) x P(B).

Your P(A) = 4/38 and since B is the same event as A, P(B) = 4/38

Typically when we talk about pure randomness we typically use independence as a way to emphasize randomness.

If however the second spin of the wheel depended on the first, then you would not be able to use the independence relationship and it would get more complicated.
 
Yeah, but there is no way the second spin depends on the previous one, unless the roulette is illegally manipulated ;)
So, is 4/38 x 4/38 the correct answer?/
 
Givem a fair wheel, (4/38)(1/38) is the probability that one of your four numbers came up on the first spin and then the same number came up on the second spin.

(4/38)(4/38) is the probability that one of your four numbers came up on the first spin and one of your four numbers came up on the second spin.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top