What Is the Probability That 4 or More Recover if a Drug Has No Effect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bartowski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
bartowski
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The probability that an individual recovers from an illness in a one-week time period without treatment is 0.1.
Suppose that 20 independent individuals suffering from this illness are treated with a drug and 4 recover in a one-week time period. If the drug has no effect, what is the probability that 4 or more people recover in a one-week time period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bartowski said:
The probability that an individual recovers from an illness in a one-week time period without treatment is 0.1.
Suppose that 20 independent individuals suffering from this illness are treated with a drug and 4 recover in a one-week time period. If the drug has no effect, what is the probability that 4 or more people recover in a one-week time period?

You're saying the probability of recovery without treatment is 0.1. This means 2 would be expected to recover out of 20 on average. In fact at least 4 people recovered with the drug. To be able to infer the drug had an effect, you really need a placebo treated control group for a proper scientific assessment.

You could possibly use the Poisson distribution to obtain the probability of 4 or more recoveries given the mean is 2. But I'm not sure of the usefulness of such an analysis. Is this one parameter distribution the correct one for your question, or do you need specific information on the variance? In any case, you can't properly assess the drug's effect without a control.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top