What Is the Real Arc of the Covenant in Transaction Diagrams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ysyl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a diagram representing a transaction's progression in an x-y plane, illustrating how transactions evolve over time. It describes the relationship between the amounts exchanged and the completion of the transaction, suggesting that a hyperbolic parabola curve emerges from plotting these points. The author proposes that viewing the diagram from different perspectives reveals unique properties of a "plain" within the x-y plane, likening it to gravitational influences between celestial bodies. Despite acknowledging the possibility of overanalyzing the diagram, the author seeks mathematical validation for their observations, particularly regarding the equation x(y-x) = constant, which they believe represents a hyperbola. The conversation invites insights from math and science experts to clarify the significance of the diagram's unusual results.
ysyl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The real arc of the covenant?

The diagram to be found at http://theometry.org/arcof_thecov.gif is my attempt at a generalized representation of a transaction taking place as seen over the course of the trans-action. Each straight line in the x-y plane represents how far the transaction has gone (1-x) and what is left to go (x), and how far the transaction has come (y) and what remains for the transaction to become completely finished (1-y). For example the transaction could be exchanging ten camels (1x) for one hundred sheep (1y), or changing one gallon of water (1x) into one quart of wine (1y), or transitioning from moving due east (1x) to moving due north (1y). Note I think you know what I mean, but you could certainly help me by advising me how to make what I am saying mathematically correct. As I am sure it is not.

But what I am sure is that as one draws straight lines from "20% of x gone and 80% of x to go" to "20% of y has arrived and "80% of y to come" over the course of this transaction, a hyperbolic parabola curve (which of course is both literally and figuratively the course of this transaction) emerges. And what also emerges for one's viewing if one is open to it is a "plain" within the x-y plane -- a "plain" with some very weird properties.

For example, if one "lies" at x = 1 and y = 0, and looks into the x-y plane, it is as if one is lying flat on the ground and looking across a flat plain. Whereas if one is "standing" at x=0 and y = 1, it is as if one is wholly looking down on this plain.

While it is obviously correct to explain away this "plain" with its straight diagonals composed of perpendicular line segments (as seen from various points on the horizon of and within this plain) as just an optical illusion, that kind of explanation strikes me a little of being like saying that it's no big deal that an apple falls to the ground. If for no other reason than because the curve of the "horizon" of the "plain" in this diagram looks a lot to me like the path of a heavenly body which is passing by another heavenly body as it goes from being free of (i.e., to coming under) the influence of the other's gravity, and then going away from being under the influence of the other's gravity to becoming free of it again.

Of course, I am likely to be making a mountain out of a mole-hill about this diagram and its curve and its plain, and its diagonal straight lines all of which lie in the x-y plane. OTOH, Isaac Asimov said that when an experiment produces a "funny" result it might be significant. And as the construction of such a curve and such a plain from such a simple algorithm produces such a "funny" diagram, I thought I'd ask you math and science experts about it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm making a mistake but it looks to me like you are dealing with this equation: x(y-x) = constant. And that is the equation of a hyperbola in cartesian coordinates.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top