What is the Recurrence Relation for Bessel's Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Altabeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a recurrence relation for Bessel's functions through the evaluation of a specific integral involving exponential and trigonometric functions. The integral in question is defined over the interval from -π to π and incorporates parameters n and x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to evaluate the integral, including integration by parts and the application of trigonometric identities. There is a focus on defining the integral in terms of I_n(x) and questioning the assumptions regarding the parameters n and x.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and seeking clarification on specific steps, such as the integration by parts. Some have proposed a recurrence relation, while others are still exploring the implications and connections to Bessel's functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the assumptions that n is an integer and that x does not depend on θ. There is also mention of the limitations of expressing certain integrals in terms of elementary functions.

Altabeh
Messages
657
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The integral is

[tex]\int _{-\pi }^{\pi }\!{\frac {{{\rm e}^{x\cos \left( \theta \right) }} \cos \left( n\theta \right) }{\pi }}{d\theta}.[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried a couple of alternative methods huddling in my mind to solve this integral, but none of them worked. Actually using De Moivre's formula and integrationa by parts this can be written as

[tex]{\frac {{{\rm e}^{x+in\pi }}-{{\rm e}^{-x-in\pi }}}{\pi }}+\int _{-\pi }^{\pi }\!{\frac {x\sin \left( \theta \right) {{\rm e}^{x\cos\left( \theta \right) +in\theta}}}{in\pi }}{d\theta}.[/tex]

where we hit the second integral which, in its indefinite form, cannot be described by the elementary functions.

Any help will be appreciated!

AB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it safe to assume that [itex]n[/itex] is an integer and [itex]x[/itex] has no [itex]\theta[/itex] dependence?

If so, just begin by defining [itex]I_n(x)\equiv\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}{\rm e}^{x\cos\theta}\cos\left(n\theta\right)}d\theta[/itex], then use integration by parts once, along with the trig identity [itex]\sin(a)\sin(b)=\frac{1}{2}\left[\cos(a-b)-\cos(a+b)\right][/itex] to derive a recurrence relation. The resulting infinite series is very well known:wink:
 
Last edited:
gabbagabbahey said:
Is it safe to assume that [itex]n[/itex] is an integer and [itex]x[/itex] has no [itex]\theta[/itex] dependence?

Yes and do you have any idea then?

AB
 
See my edited post above :smile:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
See my edited post above :smile:


Would you mind elaborating the integration by parts part a little more?

Thanks for your time.

AB
 
Well, I assume you know how to differentiate [itex]\rm{e}^{x\cos\theta}[/itex] and integrate [itex]\cos(n\theta)d\theta[/itex], so...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Well, I assume you know how to differentiate [itex]\rm{e}^{x\cos\theta}[/itex] and integrate [itex]\cos(n\theta)d\theta[/itex], so...

Okay, I get this recurrence equation in the end:

[tex]\frac{x}{2n}(I_{n-1}-I_{n+1})=I_n[/tex]

and this is..?!

AB
 
Compare that to the recurrence relation you get for Bessel's functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K