What is the relationship between angular velocity and radius in a pulley system?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between angular velocity and radius in a pulley system, specifically addressing the differences in rotational velocities of two pulleys connected by a rope. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the rotation velocity of the lower pulley compared to the upper pulley, despite both having the same radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of instantaneous axis of rotation and question how mass influences the system. There is a discussion about the motion of the center of mass of the pulleys and the relationship between linear and angular velocities. Some participants attempt to relate the velocities of the rope and pulleys but express uncertainty about the generalizability of their observations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between linear and angular velocities, but there is no explicit consensus on the underlying principles or their application to other scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific mass values and the implications of the fixed position of the upper pulley versus the upward movement of the lower pulley, which may affect their understanding of the system's dynamics.

wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



All data is in the attached image. The lower pulley has rotation velocity of 0.6 rad/s but I don't understand why. Both pulleys have same radius and the same rope passes through both of them so why are their velocities different?

Homework Equations



ω = v/r

The Attempt at a Solution



ω = 0.30/0.25 = 1.2 rad/s
 

Attachments

  • 20121213_153932.jpg
    20121213_153932.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 807
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is the instantaneous axis of rotation of the lower pulley? (That's the point on the pulley which, momentarily, is not moving.)
 
I don't know what you are talking about. If it has anything to do with the mass then I can't tell you because the mass doesn't have a specific value. It just says mass in the question.
 
wahaj said:
I don't know what you are talking about. If it has anything to do with the mass then I can't tell you because the mass doesn't have a specific value. It just says mass in the question.
The center of mass of the lower pulley is moving. Right? That's quite a different situation than that of the upper pulley, the center of mass of which is stationary.
 
Right. That's the thing that gets me. The upper pulley is fixed so all it does is rotate. But the lower pulley moves upwards. So the linear velocity of the rope does not only produce angular velocity in the lower pulley but it also produces linear velocity. But I just can't see to grasp the relationship between the two velocities. The only thing I see is that half of the velocity of the rope is used to rotate the pulley and the other half is used to move it upwards. But this is a very specific thing and I highly doubt it will work with other questions
 
wahaj said:
I don't know what you are talking about.
When a wheel rolls along a road, you can think of it as having both rotational and linear speed. That's fine, but it can be useful to understand that at each instant it is actually rotating about its point of contact with the road. This is just another way of looking at it - it gives the same answers.
The lower pulley can be thought of as rolling up a vertical road - the stationary section of string on its right. That means the string on the left is moving up at speed 2rωlower. It must be moving at the same linear speed over the top pulley, but there it's rωupper.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gc_
I get what you are saying but why in 2rωlower why 2? why not 3 or 4? I've been trying to think of a reason but I got nothing.
 
wahaj said:
I get what you are saying but why in 2rωlower why 2? why not 3 or 4? I've been trying to think of a reason but I got nothing.

Again, think of a wheel rolling along a road. The top portion of the wheel is 2r from the road's surface, so the top of the wheel is moving at a speed of 2rω . The center of the wheel moves at rω .
 
Oh now I get it. I should have thought of this before, I actually did some problems a while back where I had to determine the value of gravitational acceleration acting at different points in a loop on roller coasters. The concept applied here is the same. Thanks I should be able to get the answer now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K