What is the relationship between ds vector and theta in flux integrals?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the differential area vector ds and the angle theta in the context of flux integrals. Participants clarify that ds represents the direction normal to the surface area through which the magnetic flux is calculated. The correct components of ds are derived using trigonometric identities, specifically ds_y = -ds*cos(90-theta) and ds_z = -ds*sin(90-theta). Additionally, it is established that the induced current in a wire due to changing magnetic flux does not necessarily oppose the initial magnetic field but rather opposes the change in flux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically surface integrals
  • Familiarity with magnetic flux concepts and Faraday's Law of Induction
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their application in physics
  • Basic understanding of magnetic fields and their interactions with currents
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Learn about Faraday's Law and its implications for induced currents
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their applications in physics problems
  • Investigate the behavior of magnetic fields in relation to changing flux
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as engineers working with magnetic fields and flux integrals.

Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2017-10-07 at 2.49.31 PM.png

Part b and e.

Homework Equations


Flux = surface integral of B (dot) ds

The Attempt at a Solution


I just want to make sure that I have a good understanding of ds. ds is just the direction of the vector that is normal to our area that we are finding our flux throuhg correct? so that is why in part A we just take B*A in the -z(hat) direction because that is the direction of our ds vector. But for part b we have to find our flux in terms of the angle theta and I am stuck with how to find ds. what I have written down at the bottom there for ds is what the what it should be supposedly, but I can't see where it came from and I am struggling to derive it. How do I get ds here in terms of theta?
New Doc 2017-10-07.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
upload_2017-10-7_15-25-1.png

After correcting for the mistake shown above, can you find the y and z components of ##\vec{ds}##?
 
TSny said:
View attachment 212541
After correcting for the mistake shown above, can you find the y and z components of ##\vec{ds}##?
I had a feeling that angle wasn't theta. I am not too sure how to fix that drawing there to solve for ds. if that angle is not theta, what is it?

Edit* is it 90˚ - theta?
 
Marcin H said:
is it 90˚ - theta?
Yes.
 
TSny said:
Yes.
so to find the 2 components of ds do we just use cos and sin?

drawisland (1).png


==> ds_y = -ds*cos(90-theta)
==> ds_z = -ds*sin(90-theta)

===> ds = -ds[cos(90-theta)+sin(90-theta)]

What about the 90˚ part? how do we get rid of that?
 
TSny said:
ohhhhhhhh ok got it. That was tricky. Thanks!

I also was a bit confused by part D and E. So we have a initial flux from the surrounding Bfield going through the surface. That flux will induce a current in the wire. Now the question is which direction is it. I thought that the current should go in the direction that will produce an b field that goes against the initial B field. So by that the induced current would be clockwise. But I don't think that is correct and I am not sure why.
 
Marcin H said:
So we have a initial flux from the surrounding Bfield going through the surface. That flux will induce a current in the wire.
It's not the flux that induces a current, it's the changing flux that induces a current.

Now the question is which direction is it. I thought that the current should go in the direction that will produce an b field that goes against the initial B field.
The B field produced by the induced current does not necessarily point "against" the initial field.

The induced field creates a flux through the loop that opposes the change in initial flux. Another way to say it is that the induced flux is in a direction such as to try to keep the flux constant. Thus if the initial flux increases, the induced flux will be in the opposite direction of the initial flux. But if the initial flux decreases, the induced flux will be in the same direction as the initial flux.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K